一道逻辑题-->pumpkin转移

windweed · 发表于 2004-12-27 07:32:00

第一次做LSAT, 想练练速度. 可能是很早前做过FEIFEI,有的题有点印象,错25题错5个,时间39分钟.不好, 不过感觉是将基础打一打,LSAT也没有想象的那么不可及, 不过这道题我一直没有想清楚.

1-23. The function of government is to satisfy the genuine wants of the masses, and government cannot satisfy those wants unless it is informed about what those wants are. Freedom of speech ensures that such information will reach the ears of government officials. Therefore, freedom of speech is indispensable for a healthy state.

Which one of the following, if true, would NOT undermine the conclusion of the argument?

(A) People most often do not know what they genuinely want.

(B) Freedom of speech tends ultimately to undermine social order, and social order is a prerequisite for satisfying the wants of the masses.

(C) The proper function of government is not to satisfy wants, but to provide equality of opportunity.

(D) Freedom of speech is not sufficient for satisfying the wants of the masses: social order is necessary as well.（D）

(E) Rulers already know what the people want.

我选了C,因为我觉得C说的目的和原文的目的to satisfy wants不一样,好象对原文的逻辑过程没什么关系,所以没有weaken属无关.

D, 意思根本没读懂. 还请明白人解释解释. 非常感谢!!!

hougang · 发表于 2004-12-27 17:43:00

如你所说：“我选了C,因为我觉得C说的目的和原文的目的to satisfy wants不一样,”

所以，c是从刚开始的地方就否定了the function of government, 所以是断桥的做法啊

至于d选项，题目中说是dispensiable，选项中说not sufficient，这样并不矛盾啊，相当于必要但是不充分

hougang · 发表于 2004-12-27 17:44:00

楼主最好指明出处，谢谢

三脚猫 · 发表于 2004-12-27 22:43:00

Ｄ　言论自由不能完全满足公众的愿望，由此，社会秩序也显得很重要。

可看出Ｄ　在支持题干结论的基础上，进一步提出了社会秩序，因此not undermin the conclusion.

windweed · 发表于 2004-12-28 13:27:00

谢谢! 谢谢诸位!

我终于明白D 的意思了. 这道题是大全里的第一套LSAT中的23题.

Bensontuo · 发表于 2019-8-16 17:19:28

windweed 发表于 2004-12-27 07:32
第一次做LSAT, 想练练速度. 可能是很早前做过FEIFEI,有的题有点印象,错25题错5个,时间39分钟.不好, 不过感 ...

Spot the question type: Weaken ( Except )

Object: Weaken the conclusion of the argument

Core of the argument:

Function of gov ---> Satisfy the genuine wants of the masses ---> can satisfy those wants ---> be informed what are those wants ---> Freedom of the speech ---> indispensable for a healthy state

A. If people do know know what they want, how could they inform the government of what they want ? ---> weaken

B. Freedom of speeches ---> No wants of the masses ---> No Social order

Great concept, by having the freedom of the speeches as the sufficient condition to lead to a healthy state, it also lead to the other necessary condition as the negate of the sufficient condition of leading to one of the negate sufficient condition ( wants of the mess ) not be able to guarantee the indispensable for a healthy state.

Weaken perfectly.

C. If it is true, then we know all of the conditional logic chains could be destroyed here.

D. The other good concept here.

1. Freedom of the speech is actually the necessary condition of " satisfying the wants of the masses " so, being correct that it is not sufficient. Meanwhile, it said that in order to be sufficient it has to be that ( Freedom of speech + Social order ---> satisfying the wants of the masses ).

So, from the original argument we know that ( Satisfying the wants of the masses ---> Freedom of speech ), then we know that D is actually not weakening the original argument but to explain why freedom of speech is necessary to satisfy the wants of the masses ) - Not weaken at all.

E. If they know what people want, they don't need to be informed.

一道逻辑题-->pumpkin转移

一道逻辑题

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()