arguement

瞅瞅 · 发表于 2013-5-15 10:20:38

arguement 1求思路（自己的arguement题干中木有叙述Palea食物丰盛，不用过河这一说法，请问这是不是新GRE被修改过的原因啊？）
另附上未完成的arguement 1，虽然第一次动手写，但各位不用手下留情，尽情拍吧！
　　　According to the argument,the author believed that the so-called palea basket were not uniquely palea due to the evidence that a “palea” basket was found in Lithos recently and there was no way for the ancient Paleas to come across the Brim river which divided these two villages.Though it appears to be reasonable at first glance,the author may need more evidence to make this conclusion.
　　　The author hold the opinion that the Palea people could not get to Lithos across the Brim river for the river is very deep and broad and there were no boat have been found.But the author may have forget to examine what did the Brim river looked like thousands years ago in prehistory age.Maybe it was narrow and not very deep or maybe even there were no river between the two villages and people lived in these two villages visited each other frequently with the so-called Palea basket containing their goods.As for the means of transportation,assuming there existed the Brim river thousands years ago and it was as deep and broad as it looks today,the prehistoric people might have another way to come across the river.For instance,people living in Yunnan,China lives in this way...
还有未完成部分，因为实在找不出问题了，求解！！！

arguement

所属分类: GRE考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块