ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1596|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-3-1-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-8 21:59:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-3-1-23

23.   When 100 people who have not used cocaine are tested for cocaine use, on average only 5 will test positive. By contrast, of every 100 people who have used cocaine 99 will test positive. Thus, when a randomly chosen group of people is tested for cocaine use, the vast majority of those who test positive will be people who have used cocaine.


A reasoning error in the argument is that the argument


(A) attempts to infer a value judgment from purely factual premises


(B) attributes to every member of the population the properties of the average member of the population


(C) fails to take into account what proportion of the population have used cocaine


(D) ignores the fact that some cocaine users do not test positive


(E) advocates testing people for cocaine use when there is no reason to suspect that they have used cocaine



看得直晕,正确答案是(c),why?请大家指教.

沙发
发表于 2004-12-9 12:48:00 | 只看该作者

题干的结论可能错的原因可以一个极端的例子看出:

RANDOMLY CHOSEN 1000个人去TEST, 这1000个人刚好都不是COCAINE USERS(不是没有可能), 结果很可能是50个人POSITIVE, 所以不能说the vast majority of those who test positive will be people who have used cocaine

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-9 18:49:00 | 只看该作者

原来如此,

我懂了,

谢谢版主!

地板
发表于 2006-3-20 16:57:00 | 只看该作者
这么绕!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 10:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部