ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1347|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-2-2-8查了以前的帖子,好象没被提到过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-24 23:11:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-2-2-8查了以前的帖子,好象没被提到过

Alice: Quotas on automobile imports to the United States should be eliminated. Then domestic producers would have to compete directly with Japanese manufacturers and would be forced to produce higher-quality cars. Such competition would be good for consumers.


David: You fail to realize, Alice, that quotas on automobile imports are pervasive worldwide. Since German, Britain, and France have quotas, so should the United States.




Which one of the following most accurately characterizes David’s response to Alice’s statement?



(A) David falsely accuses Alice of contradicting herself.



(B) David unfairly directs his argument against Alice personally.



(C) David uncovers a hidden assumption underlying Alice’s position.



(D) David takes a position that is similar to the one Alice has taken.



(E) David fails to address the reasons Alice cites in favor of her conclusion


知道这道题对大虾来说很弱智,可我还是做错了,我选了C,因为觉得他们谈的论义域不同,但答案是E,不是很明白fails to address the reasons 的意思,忘哪位高手指点下,万分感谢


沙发
发表于 2005-1-25 10:53:00 | 只看该作者
E: D没能针对A提出的用于支持结论的理由。C的意思:D指出了A的观点的隐含的假设。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-25 20:47:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢,后来又仔细看了遍,用排除法做似乎只有E最说的通
地板
发表于 2006-3-17 11:56:00 | 只看该作者
还是不懂!reason是哪个?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 09:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部