ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1327|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[argument] 【Assumption】People Have Pets VS People Have No Pets VS Healthy Life

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-18 11:52:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
又是一篇Argument了。。从列提纲到写作文, 总花时间35min。。


请指教。。


1. 逻辑方面,
2. 语言方面,
3. structure方面,
4. 是否有回答了
Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptionsand what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.



谢谢。。

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-1-19 10:57:53 | 只看该作者
In conclusion, the author recommends people to reduce heart disease by having dogs is pretty preposterous when one first looks at it, and this memo contains lots of flaws so it does not support his recommendation.

这句前后应该是转折关系吧?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-19 11:03:21 | 只看该作者
In conclusion, the author recommends people to reduce heart disease by having dogs is pretty preposterous when one first looks at it, and this memo contains lots of flaws so it does not support his recommendation.

这句前后应该是转折关系吧?
-- by 会员 普渡哥 (2013/1/19 10:57:53)



怎样转折呢?


我上面的四个问题请问您的答复是?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-1 11:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部