The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.
The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.
(A) merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
(B) as merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from examining tools found in Germany, which include
(C) as mere meat scavengers, has emerged from examining tools found in Germany that includes
(D) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes
(E) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
1,我的理解是像found in Germany, 20 years ago 这种描述状态或时间的短语,有时候是可以略过的。当然tools 紧跟which 是最好的,但是都没有的话,which放后面也是可以接受的。 2,Ving,一般是修饰主句主语的,如果用including,那么就会变成The new image of Stone Age people including(includes) three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old. 不符合逻辑,所以错误。 Ving 放句末还有一种情况是修饰整个句子,这里也不符合逻辑,所以也是错误的。