og,sc上一题，求大牛们解释，积人品

maggie0217 · 发表于 2014-7-23 13:36:06

In 1995 Richard Stallman, a well-known critic of the patent system, testified in Patent Office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kirchhoff's laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary physics.

Alaws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and
Blaws, which was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and it is
Claws, namely, it was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and
Dlaws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845, it is
Elaws that was an observation about electric current, first made in 1845, and is

答案选A, 不太懂为什么，求解释。谢谢各位大牛，祝大家杀G成功。

neverland1021 · 发表于 2014-7-23 14:07:33

不是牛牛，但是我是这样来做的；
A an observation直接做 a patent的同位语解释（有些疑惑，an observation是做a patent还是做one of K law的同位语？？？这一点也坐等牛牛解惑。。），看横线后面的now included...是修饰an observation about electric current, and前后两个成分(made和included)逻辑和结构上都满足平行，没问题
B and it is 和前面which部分不平行，and前面是个修饰成分后面是个完整的句子
C namely出现，前后都应该是名词
D it is前面的逗号不能连接两个句子
E first made in 1845,这个把原来的essential modifer改成non-essential modifer，句子含义改变,and 后面的is 和前面的was平行，从而no include后面的部分不再修饰an oberservation,错

吃饭睡觉打豆豆 · 发表于 2014-7-23 15:11:13

小菜豆是这么做的，
看到选项开始是个区分名词修饰语的POE
然后看看句子，这里明显是要做名词解释，因此用同位语从句最合适。

maggie0217 · 发表于 2014-7-26 06:52:56

谢谢谢谢，感激

DUKB24 · 发表于 2014-7-26 09:09:17

摘自我自己编写的OG13千行笔记：

关键split：subject-verb agreement；verb tense；meaning
A. protect主谓不一致，错误
B. 正确
C. protect主谓不一致，错误
D. to的出现把法律规定的东西这层意思 → 变成了法律的目的，意思不合理，错误；（the law is to protect turtles，not to use the devices！）are protecting和主语单复数不一致
E. to错误同上

本贴相关题目 OG (PLVH)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

og,sc上一题，求大牛们解释，积人品

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()