ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (PLVH)

00:00:00

In 1995 Richard Stallman, a well-known critic of the patent system, testified in Patent Office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kirchhoff's laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary physics.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2279|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og,sc上一题,求大牛们解释,积人品

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-7-23 13:36:06 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

In 1995 Richard Stallman, a well-known critic of the patent system, testified in Patent Office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kirchhoff's laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary physics.

  • Alaws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and  
  • Blaws, which was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and it is  
  • Claws, namely, it was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and  
  • Dlaws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845, it is  
  • Elaws that was an observation about electric current, first made in 1845, and is  

答案选A, 不太懂为什么, 求解释。谢谢各位大牛,祝大家杀G成功。

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-7-23 14:07:33 | 只看该作者
不是牛牛,但是我是这样来做的;
A an observation直接做 a patent的同位语解释(有些疑惑,an observation是做a patent还是做one of K law的同位语???这一点也坐等牛牛解惑。。),看横线后面的now included...是修饰an observation about electric current, and前后两个成分(made和included)逻辑和结构上都满足平行,没问题
B and it is 和前面which部分不平行,and前面是个修饰成分后面是个完整的句子
C namely出现,前后都应该是名词
D it is前面的逗号不能连接两个句子
E first made in 1845,这个把原来的essential modifer改成non-essential modifer,句子含义改变,and 后面的is 和前面的was平行,从而no include后面的部分不再修饰an  oberservation,错
板凳
发表于 2014-7-23 15:11:13 | 只看该作者
小菜豆是这么做的,
看到选项开始是个区分名词修饰语的POE
然后看看句子,这里明显是要做名词解释,因此用同位语从句最合适。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2014-7-26 06:52:56 | 只看该作者
谢谢谢谢,感激
5#
发表于 2014-7-26 09:09:17 | 只看该作者
摘自我自己编写的OG13千行笔记:

关键split:subject-verb agreement;verb tense;meaning
A.        protect主谓不一致,错误
B.        正确
C.        protect主谓不一致,错误
D.        to的出现把法律规定的东西这层意思 → 变成了法律的目的,意思不合理,错误;(the law is to protect turtles,not to use the devices!)are protecting和主语单复数不一致
E.        to错误同上

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 20:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部