ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A team of scientists has recently provided evidence of Earth being bombarded daily with as many as 40,000 small comets, vaporizing in the upper atmosphere to fall to Earth as rain.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3130|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急救我!关于that并列·

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-1 11:07:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A team of scientists has recently provided evidence of Earth being bombarded daily with as many as 40,000 small comets, vaporizing in the upper atmosphere to fall to Earth as rain.



(A) of Earth being bombarded daily with as many as 40,000 small comets, vaporizing in the upper atmosphere to

(B) of Earth's being daily bombarded with as many as 40,000 small comets, vaporizing in the upper atmosphere and that

(C) that as much or more than 40,000 small comets daily bombard Earth, vaporizing in the upper atmosphere, and

(D) that daily Earth is bombarded with as much or more than 40,000 small comets that vaporize in the upper atmosphere and that

(E) that Earth is bombarded daily with as many as 40,000 small comets that vaporize in the upper atmosphere and
(D) daily位置改变使其修饰对象错误as much or more than搭配错误;and that在语法上与前面的that

并列,不符合逻辑,应该去掉thatvaporize作并列从句谓语。
我想问prep上,这里and that与前面that并列是指那个that啊?comets的还是evidence的?假如是comets,我觉得可以啊。

我自己的理解:(求牛人核实指点啊因为前面有evidence thatand that在语法上与前面的that并列,不符合逻辑,应该不加thatvaporize平行。但OG12 48 In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Iliad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced the greatest translation in any language.不补出的话会与前面形成并列而不是修饰a work。所以没有什么定从并列必补that,顺承或者会连到前面的另一个定从产生歧义时可以不补出。同样,如果和前面主句产生并列歧义就要补出,一切以有无歧义为准。






并列,不符合逻辑,应该去掉thatvaporize作并列从句谓语。
我想问prep上,这里and that与前面that并列是指那个that啊?comets的还是evidence的?假如是comets,我觉得可以啊。

我自己的理解:(求牛人核实指点啊因为前面有evidence thatand that在语法上与前面的that并列,不符合逻辑,应该不加thatvaporize平行。但OG12 48 In 1713, Alexander Pope began his translation of the Iliad, a work that took him seven years to complete and that literary critic Samuel Johnson, Pope’s contemporary, pronounced the greatest translation in any language.不补出的话会与前面形成并列而不是修饰a work。所以没有什么定从并列必补that,顺承或者会连到前面的另一个定从产生歧义时可以不补出。同样,如果和前面主句产生并列歧义就要补出,一切以有无歧义为准。






收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-12-1 12:21:04 | 只看该作者
注意这里的D是: evidence that the earth....more than(that) small comets that......所以应该去掉后一个that..
OG 12: a work that.......and (a work) that......所以这里的that是需要补出的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-1 14:17:43 | 只看该作者
谢谢你的回答,但我问的是句尾 and that fall这that语法上和evidence that并列抑或是和comets that并列·。。而不是比较对象that的省略·
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部