ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4178|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 14-Q14

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-30 10:47:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.



A.Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete

B.Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies

C.The lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, unlike the Internet where they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete

D.Unlike more established industries, where the lines of competition are clearly defined, they are burred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as companies that compete

E.Unlike more established industries, with clearly defined lines of competition, those of the Internet industry are blurred and indistinct, as competing companies
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-8-30 15:42:27 | 只看该作者
这个不是一争议题么,不过好像CD更倾向B,说A的问题有more established industries歧义和companies that compete的表述不清晰
板凳
发表于 2011-8-30 17:33:24 | 只看该作者
A is not parellel.... "whereas lines of competition blablablabla", should follow line of competition or something similar.
地板
发表于 2011-9-3 20:14:53 | 只看该作者
顺路问下whereas形式是不是不一定对等的
5#
发表于 2011-9-21 21:33:02 | 只看该作者
whereas不需要对等
6#
发表于 2011-9-28 14:28:38 | 只看该作者
我觉得这题是A诶。
一方面是whereas应该是不强求形式上的完全对等(当然对等更好)的吧,prep语法笔记:whereas连接的平行比较只要求对比的核心逻辑上有对称关系,不要求对称位置必须是对称名词。
另一方面,看到有指出competing companies和companies that compete的争议。我觉得A更好,是因为这题要说的是:某天竞争的公司在另一天可能就合作了。如果用B里面的competing companies,感觉one day修饰的companies,表达的是“永远”的竞争公司(那又怎么会某天变成合作者了内...);而A里面 companies that compete one day,这里的one day感觉修饰的是compete,然后that定语从句一起修饰companies,意思上更加符合
另外就是还看到有说more的修饰的问题,我也觉得A好,是因为觉得A中的more前有the,应该是more直接修饰established的,而没有more (established industries)的歧义了...

不知道这样解释通么...大家来讨论讨论吧,纠正我思路不对的地方...><
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部