prep 2#217 请教一道完全不知道在考什么的题

217.
            (31117-!-item-!-188;#058&005981)     (GWD-8-Q11)

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.

E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.

不会，完全不知道在考什么？

A肯定不对，there are重复了，a circumstance之前缺少修饰，their的用法也不对

B项中them不可指代monkfish，只能指代复数名词limits

C也错了，which应指代no legal limits on the size of monkfish

D正确

E中catching重复

楼主没明白题目的意思吗还是怎样？意思是 捕捞安康鱼时，由于缺乏像（捕捞）鳕鱼那样的法定尺寸限制造成的过度捕捞导致安康鱼数量锐减

而且D肯定不对～which不能指代前句～

217.
            (31117-!-item-!-188;#058&005981)     (GWD-8-Q11)

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
            

A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
            

B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.

E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
            

关于E选项，你的意思是there be后面的主语是legal size limits么？～～虽然其他选项都有问题，但是对于A选项我很不看好

首先：用了2个there be 看上去好wordy and awkward

再：分析下A的结构，There are no legal limits, as there are（no legal limits）
                    for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.把省略补上还是不是很好美的对称， 一个是for cod and haddock 另一个是on the size of monkfish。感觉上好ugly～是我自己本身对这种句型不是很习惯，还是这个句子本身就不好，因为没得选才选的它呀～～～

关于E选项，你的意思是there be后面的主语是legal size limits么？～～虽然其他选项都有问题，但是对于A选项我很不看好

首先：用了2个there be 看上去好wordy and awkward

再：分析下A的结构，There are no legal limits, as there are（no legal limits）
            for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.把省略补上还是不是很好美的对称， 一个是for cod and haddock 另一个是on the size of monkfish。感觉上好ugly～是我自己本身对这种句型不是很习惯，还是这个句子本身就不好，因为没得选才选的它呀～～～

10月底就考了。才复习了1个多月。也就觉得语法比较有意思，所以就多做了些～～～恩。。谢谢提醒～

选A.选择理由如下：as与它修饰的首句做比较"there are ..."结构对称清楚；a circumstance同位语解释前面的句子。

B：“unlike cod or haddock”和“there are”不符合，而且根据OG11倾向于将UNLIKE放在句首；“a circumstance that ”同位语离它修饰之间插入成分，句子不明了。

C:which非限定性定语从句错误地修饰monkfish,逻辑错误； on the size of cod and haddock ”表达模糊可以有两种理解；its无指代。

D：“unlike cod or haddock”和“there are”不符合；which非限定性定语从句错误地修饰monkfish,逻辑错误；

E:：“unlike cod or haddock”和“there are”不符合;"because they are overfished"没有through overfishing简洁。

个人支持A  首先as构成前后句式的比较结构 前后there be句型对应 非常清晰明确 而且不会造成歧义因为后面是介词短语部分 that就近修饰没有歧义 circumstance的概括性同位结构具有解释力 a circumstance that的同位语结构正确符合语法规则 主干清晰 没有关键信息的掩埋

B中unlike的比较对象不清晰 可以认为从前 也可以认为从后 unlike句型只可以放在主语前后进行比较而倒置根据OG和BY里面都认为是很不好的选项； there are being done出现错！OG和prep中没有对的 there be只可以后面加名词表示自然拥有 不能加动词 更何况是被动态

C中which的指代错误 but for结构没有平行并列的对象 结构不清晰 逻辑混乱 同时引入原文中没有的转折关系 严重改变原文所要表达的逻辑意思 不符合prep精神

D中unlike结构与后面不对等 Prep笔记中都认为there be结构不能够和unlike结构对应 即使把倒装复位 limits也不能够和cod haddock对应 因为不满足比较对象对等的原则 直接排出 which非限定性定语从句错误地修饰monkfish,逻辑错误； 被动态没有必要

E中unlike错误同D， their没有指代对象 或者说指代对象不符合逻辑要求 因为只可以指代limits 而应该指代的是monkfish 因果倒置造成繁冗 不符合OG12的精神 被动态不好 分词结构在句尾 在这里作为表示结果的状语从句 不存在逻辑主语的问题 从逻辑上即使不会造成由monkfish发出的歧义但是也强调与主句动作同时发生 不符合题意和逻辑关系

个人不建议LZ只根据There be进行排除 因为即使是老Prep中也出现了there is little that 这种明显看起来就很繁冗的句型作为正确选项的例子 这样依靠语感以及并不十分熟悉的语法规则并不是很可靠的 只要there be后面是一个名词就不应该首先排除 而是先从句子结构以及基本的语法考点入手还是比较稳的～这道题实际上个人认为还是靠的比较结构 unlike比较对象不对等 直接排出B D E 剩下A C 很明显A更加清晰 所以还是A好 

个人的拙见 各位拍砖～～