ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1073|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

哪位大侠来帮帮忙

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-18 15:42:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
We take for granted that A. Nevertheless, does the fact inevitable indicates that B? the speaker here apparently temps to confirm that the former takes automatic procedure over the latter. While I agree with the speaker insofar as A, I find no empirical evidence to wholly accept the author’s position, which appears to be unconvincing in light of more persuasive assertion, Those Ts
The primary reason for my view rests on the undeniable fact that history is replete with evidence of R1. Notables ranging from X to Y come immediately to mind. On the one hand, consider the success of X. On the other hand, let us take Y into account. By the same token, Y does the same, Indeed, both cases illustrate the point that R1, as many as other similar cases do.
Another reason for my view is that R2. Empirical evidence supporting this reason is overwhelming. One needs look no further than Z to appreciate that this is indeed the case. As can be obviously seen, Z is that. Admittedly, stories such as this are not rare so that this case is, as has been noted, one of many examples that underscore the point that.
To oppose my view, you might point that Q1. To be honest, I confess that Q1. However, you may further argue that Q2. Here we part company. In any event, do Q2? Emphatically. “No”
In the final analysis, TS. Therefore, although.
请问TS,Q1 Q2 Z 都是什么意思,我理解的不够透彻,谢谢了!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 17:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部