ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3950|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG12-101,官方解释困惑,求助!!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-4 16:25:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG12-101,官方解释困惑,求助!!!!

 

101. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of

action, especially if it has worked well in the past,

makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or

misinterpret them when they do appear.

(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course

of action, especially if it has worked well in the

past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient

trouble or misinterpret them when they do

appear.

(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a

course of action, especially one that worked well

in the past, makes missing signs of incipient

trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they

do appear.

(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a

course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret

signs of incipient trouble when they do appear,

especially if it has worked well in the past.

(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course

of action, especially if it has worked well in the

past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient

trouble or misinterpreting them when they do

appear.

(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action,

especially one that has worked well in the past,

is likely to make an executive miss signs of

incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they

do appear.

C Th e reference for the pronoun it is unclear
                        

because many nouns have intervened

between the appearance of the logical

referent (course of action) and it.

because many nouns have intervened

between the appearance of the logical

referent (course of action) and it.

it is unclear
            

because many nouns have intervened

between the appearance of the logical

referent (course of action) and it.

course of action) and it.
    

答案为E。C解释说it指代不清。a course of action我觉得这是it唯一能指代的东西。怎么指代不清了?明白的CDer帮忙。感觉最近坛子里大家都比较低调。问题经常是等个两三天没人回答,还得自己顶……

沙发
发表于 2009-10-4 17:02:00 | 只看该作者

如果C是这样,你觉得如何呢:

An executive who is heavily committed to a

course of action ,especially the one that has worked well in the past ,is likely to miss or misinterpret

signs of incipient trouble when they do appear.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-4 18:35:00 | 只看该作者
回楼上。the one指代谁?An executive
        
还是 a

course of action?自己感觉有指代不清嫌疑。还是觉得答案说C中的it指代不清没有道理。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-4 20:30:00 | 只看该作者
感觉C的最大错误好像在于重心转移……不知道各位怎么看?
5#
发表于 2009-10-4 21:39:00 | 只看该作者

同楼上,重心错了所以指代不清了,  it指代的是commitment 而不是course

6#
发表于 2009-10-8 23:09:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得C 并没有转移重心啊。

原题heavy commitment makes an executive miss signs or misinterpret them ........

C: An executive is likely to miss or misinterpret signs.........

我觉得两者的重心一样啊,而且OG 的解释是说逻辑重点是要弄清楚是谁misinterpret signs。 C 同样也是说executive misinterprets啊。

而且E 的being heavily committed 总觉得很别扭.

7#
发表于 2010-1-10 22:37:04 | 只看该作者
C多读几遍就觉得别扭了。一个executive 致力于某项做法 可能会 ... ...,  特别当它是过去用得不错的。这个对course of action的修饰的has worked well in the past 离 course of action也太远了点... ...所以一下子让人感觉不到这个it就是修饰前面的course of action.       E是 拿Being commited ...做了主语, 不常在og里见到,但是 是正确的句子,也还通顺。
8#
发表于 2011-4-22 17:36:16 | 只看该作者
很奇怪多数人居然会错选B,其实最容易选错的是C,我虽然 选对了,但也是靠感觉,至今不明白C中的it怎么会有指代歧义,显然只可能指代a course of action,说实话,OG12的很多解释都有点不负责任
C选项的错误更多的说是错在改变了原句大的框架结构。这是SC长难句题目中一个重要的判断点。
原句说commitment  makes   executives  do ......
c说   executives  (who...原句的主语在这变成了定语从句)  are likely to do....

再看E 的大结构:Being committed to...  is likely to make executives do....和原句基本一致
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-8 03:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部