LR求解！！

s_dUSA · 发表于 2011-2-11 18:04:39

A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking
second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept.
They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for
public use.

Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not
unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for
public use.

为什么是B,绕来绕去没搞明白，高手解答

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2011-2-15 09:49:27

If architecture is inviting and functional for public architecture, then it is unobtrusive.

Modern archetects plagued by egoism have violated the above precept. Violate is the key word.

Therefore, when modern archetects are plagued by egoism, they are not unobtrusive.

LR求解！！

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()