ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7441|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD3-Q39:

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-10 14:51:00 | 只看该作者

GWD3-Q39:

Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.

A.      Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

B.      Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,

C.      Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they

D.      Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

E.       Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they

请问为什么选A呀?     C和D为什么不对呀?  谢谢

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-10 23:52:00 | 只看该作者

请高手帮忙啊   顶一下

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-11 08:39:00 | 只看该作者

地板
发表于 2008-8-11 09:11:00 | 只看该作者
这道题应该有争议。
C)肯定错,最后的they带出另外一个句子,所以前面少了一个and。
A)很awkward。 X do a and, compared with Y, do b, do c, and do d这样的句式有点问题。可以说,X do a and, compared with Y, do b;也可以说,X, compared with Y, do b, do c, and do d。但把两个揉到一个句子里面,虽然语法上不一定错,总是很怪。最好是分成两句: minivans carry ...;compared with SUV, they do a, do b, and do d。
D)语法上肯定没错。X, doing a(现在分词修饰X),compared with Y, do b, do c, and do d。但因为doing a和compared with Y紧连着,听起来很怪,也有歧义:好像compared with Y的部分是doing a那一块。如果把carrying...调到句子前面就好多了。
个人倾向于选A)。起码A)意思表达清楚,而且在所以选项都有问题的情况下,优先选择保持原句式。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-11 22:28:00 | 只看该作者

ok  谢谢拉

6#
发表于 2008-8-12 13:57:00 | 只看该作者

看后面三个短句,都是原型的动词,所以前面肯定也要是原型的verb,并列原则,cost前面肯定不能有主语,因为后面三个都没有,而且carry也必须是原型,所以只能是A。

BTW,我们做语法关注的是它要考的点以及它提供的信息,你不要管它是否对错,可能你觉得这样写句子有问题,但是要在它给的环境下来找错误,这才是做题的思路和方向。

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-12 15:00:00 | 只看该作者

ok   thank you

8#
发表于 2008-12-25 17:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用georgetseng在2008-8-11 9:11:00的发言:
这道题应该有争议。
C)肯定错,最后的they带出另外一个句子,所以前面少了一个and。
A)很awkward。 X do a and, compared with Y, do b, do c, and do d这样的句式有点问题。可以说,X do a and, compared with Y, do b;也可以说,X, compared with Y, do b, do c, and do d。但把两个揉到一个句子里面,虽然语法上不一定错,总是很怪。最好是分成两句: minivans carry ...;compared with SUV, they do a, do b, and do d。
D)语法上肯定没错。X, doing a(现在分词修饰X),compared with Y, do b, do c, and do d。但因为doing a和compared with Y紧连着,听起来很怪,也有歧义:好像compared with Y的部分是doing a那一块。如果把carrying...调到句子前面就好多了。
个人倾向于选A)。起码A)意思表达清楚,而且在所以选项都有问题的情况下,优先选择保持原句式。

c是错误的

they如果要引导一个新的句子,they前面必须加and

我赞同D是对的

9#
发表于 2009-3-18 06:26:00 | 只看该作者

从逻辑上来讲D没有A好

A讲的是能CARRY 7 PEOPLE这个事实

但是D是用伴随状况

10#
发表于 2009-3-18 08:18:00 | 只看该作者
A中的"compared with most sport utility vehicles"是修"cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride."
D中的"carrying as many as seven passengers"誤修"cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride."
所以D不對.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 21:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部