[求助]确认2道题目

Although she had been known as an effective legislator first in the Texas Senate and later

in the United States House of Representatives, not until Barbara Jordan’s participation in

the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in 1974 was she made a

nationally recognized figure, as it was televised nationwide.

A. later in the United States House of Representatives, not until Barbara Jordan’s

participation in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in

1974 was she made a nationally recognized figure, as it was

B. later in the United States House of Representatives, Barbara Jordan did not

become a nationally recognized figure until 1974, when she participated in the

hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which were

C. later in the Untied States House of Representatives, it was not until 1974 that

Barbara Jordan became a nationally recognized figure, with her participation in

the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which was

D. then also later in the United States House of Representatives, not until 1974 did

Barbara Jordan become a nationally recognized figure, as she participated in the

hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, being

E. then also later in the United States House of Representatives, Barbara Jordan did

not become a nationally recognized figure until 1974, when she participated in the

hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which was

I choose A; answer is B; I do not think “which” can refer to “hearings"; A good example is a question " to 10 percent from 6 percent of its market, which..." "which can refer to market clearly" while "from 6 percent of its market to 10 percent in the country, which" "whcih cannot refer to markey"

Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and

landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the

first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

A. Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life

and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who

became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win

B. She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the

peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in

1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won

C. Selma Lagerlöf was a novelist who turned away from literary realism to write

romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and in

1909 she became the first woman in addition to the first Swedish writer winning

D. A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about

the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlöf became in

1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win

E. As a novelist, Selma Lagerlöf turned away from literary realism and wrote

romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909

becoming the first woman and also the first Swedish writer that won

I choose A; answer is D; “and also” in D and E may be wrong, I remember OG regards “and also” as redundant error??

第一题B，hearings在这里解释为：听证会，也的确是这个听证会were televised nationwide。A中的it指代不明确或不合理。

第二题D，首先，我大致查了一遍OG，没有找到明确说明‘and also多余’的解释，OG中大量的and also是由于not only..but also搭配的错误。（不过，我找得不是太仔细，希望进一步确认。）。对A的错误有如下看法：首先，这个句子用分词结构不尽合理，turn away和became是明确的先后动作，所以用分词表示一定程度上的伴随不妥；此外，in 1909这个状语的位置也不是很好；此外，turning作为动作的伴随，与主句中was而不是主句中who从句的became形成匹配，这是一个严重错误；另外；was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first句子中的平行结构混乱and后的was结构即可以与第一个was平行，也可能被理解为与became平行；
对不起，其他答案没有仔细看，觉得D好像没有什么错误。

第一题，which指代the impeachment

第二题，我的stone意见相左，恰恰d的in 1909位置不对，a把它放在人名前我倒觉得没什么不对；另外

turn away和became是明确的先后动作，所以用分词表示一定程度上的伴随不妥

分词结构不仅可以表示伴随，还可以表示原因，结果，条件，让步等情况，这里完全可以用分词表示先于become发生的情况。

1, The "which were" wants a plural antecedant of which, thus only "hearings" meets this requirement.

第一题，A中it指代impeachment也是逻辑上比较可行的方案，但是即便是单数指代，作为修饰成分的impeachment(出自：in the hearings on the impeachment of )也不应该是优先的指代对象，虽然我们从句子的逻辑上判断，impeachment或许更合理，但是，为什么不可能是participation呢？或许从就近修饰的角度看，figure也不失为一个选择。所以，我认为，第一题it的指代不明确。另外，was she made a nationally recognized figure这个被动语态也有问题，因为动作的逻辑主语相当模糊，是某个人？还是某件事？还是媒体？等等都不清楚，所以这个被动结构也显得不好。

第二题，如A所示，其状语结构in 1909 Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and ...表达意思不准确，作者想要表达的是：L这个人在1909年became XX，但是，A结构的意思却可以被理解为：L这个人在1909年的时候才是个作家，而这个作家在某个没有表明的时间里became XX。而D中Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman就讲状语与其所要修饰的动作连在一起，明确表明1909年，L became XX。

虽然在一定程度上，我赞成你的看法：分词结构不仅可以表示伴随，还可以表示原因，结果，条件，让步等情况，这里完全可以用分词表示先于become发生的情况。但是，我并不认为上述的理由是没有限制的，当两个动作之间没有密切的联系，或没有一点伴随的含义时，动作与动作之间应该用andl连接比较好，因为and就是强调了动作的先后。在此题中，turn away的确应该发生在became前，但是，became动作的发生必定是turn away动作结束后才开始的，不会是伴随着turn away这个动作开始的，所以，用分词结构不合适。

第一题的A中it缺少合理的指代对象,BJ's..she也违反了代词不能指代possessive noun的原则,尽管这条原则事实证明有时也有例外,并非公理,但是这个句子里改成her, BJ句子明显要顺畅许多,另外sb is made a well known figure好像也不如sb becomes a well known figure来得简洁利落

D选项里的which were没问题,虽然离hearings是远了点,但是中间的impeachment和President Nixon都是单数, 所以没有歧义

第二题A的最大问题在于Selma Lagerlöf was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win,因为有了这个and把前面的woman和writer to win给割裂开了,成了单纯的SL was the novelist who become the first woman,逻辑上不能成立.其实本题想要表达的是SL became the (first women and also the first swedish writer) to win nobel prize

2，D   Selma Lagerlöf became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win

D的in1909的位置在动词和宾语之间，这应该是错的呀。

我也觉得很奇怪

1.which不是说只能修饰前面紧挨着的名词吗？为什么能修是如此遥远的hearings？

2。from literary realism to write romantic stories 中的from和to后面的短语不是应该并列吗？