ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2773|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-29-Q29 虚心请教!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-5-4 13:31:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
40: GWD-29-Q29
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.
A.    year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
B.    year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
C.    year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D.    year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously
E.    year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

答案给的D,我选了C。 想请问的是C中的比较(compared to)问题出在哪里?还有是previously的位置不对么?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-5-4 21:13:45 | 只看该作者
previously 是副词应该不能修饰$7吧
板凳
发表于 2012-5-20 21:17:16 | 只看该作者
看了http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc-scoetop-t1100.html
对A的解释是
"previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.

但是我还是困惑A
为什么paying不能修饰句子最开始的students呢?
地板
发表于 2012-5-25 22:36:09 | 只看该作者
看了http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc-scoetop-t1100.html
对A的解释是
"previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.

但是我还是困惑A
为什么paying不能修饰句子最开始的students呢?
-- by 会员 christete (2012/5/20 21:17:16)



是不是因为A里面没有转折的意思啊?比如 instead of 的那种意思
5#
发表于 2012-5-26 14:33:47 | 只看该作者
看了http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc-scoetop-t1100.html
对A的解释是
"previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.

但是我还是困惑A
为什么paying不能修饰句子最开始的students呢?
-- by 会员 christete (2012/5/20 21:17:16)

你自己看看paying和students的距离。优美么?让你,你会这么写么??!修饰成分里修饰对象太远了
6#
发表于 2012-5-26 15:55:48 | 只看该作者
如果你想修饰students,那这里做的是伴随动作状语. OK,如果这样想是没有问题的.但是,你注意看下文章的逻辑意思,这里pay 7....的,它是一种比较,是属于that从句内容里面的一个比较,现在付的跟以前付的比较...如果你把这里定位成了修饰students,那就是伴随动作,是跟主句谓语并列了..
^-^.. 总而言之,这里主要的意思想说明的就是比较啦。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 01:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部