ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3473|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全103

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-23 03:02:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全103

American productivity is declining in relation to Europe's; the energy expended per unit of production in the United States is as much as twice that expended in West Germany.


(A) as much as twice that expended in West Germany


(B) as much as twice that of West Germany’s expenditure


(C) up to two times of West Germany’s expenditure


(D) up to two times what West Germans expended


(E) up to double the West German expenditure


大全的解释是:"A is best. B中of West Germany’s expenditure不对应,意思不准确。C, D, E中up to错, 无法准确表达意思."


我对A中的"as much as twice that expended in West Germany."有疑问:前面的"energy expended"中,"expended表被动修饰energy,而划线部分似乎缺"is"表被动,即"as much as twice that is expended in West Germany". 什么情况下"that"后面的助动词可省略?


如果expended在划线部分中只是动词过去时表主动意味,我觉得前后的比较便不对称.请各位NN指教.多谢!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-23 12:40:00 | 只看该作者

自己找到了答案.被动式助动词省略的例子出现在OG218:


Despite protests from some waste-disposal companies, state health officials have ordered the levels of bacteria in seawater at popular beaches to be measured and that the results be published.


E. that the levels of bacteria in seawater at popular beaches be measured and the results published.


E为正确选项.


注意E: the results published 省略了"be". 平行结构中be确实可省略!


板凳
发表于 2005-5-23 14:53:00 | 只看该作者
我做og218时也对这个很疑惑,是不是平行结构中的助动词可以省略?是否不省略的要比省略的要好,如果两个答案同时存在的话?
地板
发表于 2005-8-30 11:36:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得省不省都可以,比较时尽量补出为好。
5#
发表于 2005-8-30 12:28:00 | 只看该作者

up to 有下面的意思。那么,d是不是值得考虑呢?毕竟,A中 twice总觉得有问题.


我觉得twice在此只能是副词,可是他怎么能修饰that(energy)呢?值得探讨!


up to something
a) as much or as many as a certain amount or number but not more
The Olympic Stadium will hold up to 80,000 spectators. a process that can take anything up to ten days


6#
发表于 2005-9-6 21:29:00 | 只看该作者

一开始我也选了d,搜索一下前人的帖子,我觉得D的问题不再于用了up to, 而在于two times 的使用。


two times 意思有歧义1)2倍 2)2次
我记得OG里面好像有提到过造成歧义
另外: twice 更加符合简洁的原则。


请大家讨论这种解释是否成立

7#
发表于 2005-11-16 23:46:00 | 只看该作者

再讨论!这里two times绝对没有歧义。


two times只有修饰实意动词时才有歧义!!这里是在be后面呀。


up!

8#
发表于 2005-11-17 13:06:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得这里不是省略be动词的问题,'expended' is used as an adj. and modifies 'that'.  

in my opinion, 'that expended' seems better than 'that is expended' because the former is more succinct

仅供参考:)
9#
发表于 2006-11-29 20:39:00 | 只看该作者
偶觉得这题的考点应该是 ‘as much as + adv.’ 和比较里的平行结构,其实OG里有另外一道类似的题,看看这题或许就明白了。

    

    An inventory equal to 90 days
sales is as much as even the strongest businesses carry, and then only
as a way to anticipate higher prices or ensure against shortages.


    

(A) as much as
even


    

(B) so much as
even


    

(C) even so much
as


    

(D) even as much
that
A


    

(E) even so much
that



这题的答案是A.
10#
发表于 2008-4-23 14:15:00 | 只看该作者

这里的平行貌似工整,但实则很别扭。好像没见过OG里有that单独作主语/宾语的例子(各位如有见过,请不吝提出),也没见过that后面直接跟过去分词。

其实这里比较的是amount,不是energy,我觉得这样比较顺:The energy expended per unit of production in the United States is as much as twice the amount West Germany expended.

这个题有点偏,还是OG比较大气。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 19:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部