1. 首先这两班子人的择业目的就是不一样的，前者是为了对社会有益，实现自我价值，而后者是为了赚钱，莫求利益，不同的追求导致激励的手段应该是不一样的，所以么有可比性；
2，其次这两中组织也是不一样的，一个是谋求利润最大化的经济实体，一个是为社会做贡献，所以前者把后者的目标视为己任是不现实的。
3.可以再让步说，即便捐献等等公益活动可以激励员工，但是也没有证据显示用于捐献的cost可以overweigh激励员工后所产出的利润，这个‘大幅’是groundless的
“Studies have found that employees of not-for-profit organizations and charities are often more highly motivated than employees of for-profit corporations to perform well at work when their performance is not being monitored or evaluated. Interviews with employees of not-for-profit organizations suggest that the reason for their greater motivation is the belief that their work helps to improve society. Because they believe in the importance of their work, they have personal reasons to perform well, even when no financial reward is present. Thus, if our corporation began donating a significant portion of its profits to humanitarian causes, our employees’ motivation and productivity would increase substantially and our overall profits would increase as well.”
研究发现非盈利组织和慈善机构的雇员比盈利公司雇员更积极的在工作中表现突出，当他们的表现没有被监视和评价的时候。对非盈利组织雇员的采访表明他们更高的积极性的原因是认为他们的工作帮助社会进步的信念。因为他们相信他们工作的重要性，所以他们有个人的原因去更好的表现即使没有奖励。所以，如果我们的公司开始捐赠一部分可观的利润给人道主义事业，我们的雇员的积极性和生产力将会大幅度的增加，同时我们的利润也会增大。
-- by 会员 maggie0406 (2009/12/2 23:33:18)
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-12-2 23:33:18
收藏
收藏
