ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 32756|回复: 43
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]求解prep语法新题一道prep1-188

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-25 23:02:00 | 只看该作者

[原创]求解prep语法新题一道prep1-188

188.
            
(26379-!-item-!-188;#058&001961)

 

Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

A. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are

B. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are

C. Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are

D. Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

E. Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

答案是A,我选的是E,不是说having+done结构不能作定语吗?

沙发
发表于 2009-2-26 00:34:00 | 只看该作者

E肯定是不对的,它改变了原句的含义,句子的重心。

句子的结构是:

Neuroscientists, (插入语修饰主语)are now drawing solid conclusions about A & B。

但E却改变成:

Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge about A & B,now drawing......

没有:having+done结构不能作定语 这样的定论。

板凳
发表于 2009-2-26 11:50:00 | 只看该作者

having done这里是做定语.

我认为having done作定语主要是会产生时间上的歧义:having done的东西是延续着、持久着(现在分词短语做定语的内在含义之一),还是已经完结。over the past twenty years时间状语的存在让这重歧义不存在,表明了已经完结,所以是可以这么用的.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

地板
发表于 2009-2-26 12:08:00 | 只看该作者
是不是也应该考虑主句里使用了现在进行时
Neuroscientists are now drawing
5#
发表于 2009-2-27 18:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用aeoluseros在2009-2-26 11:50:00的发言:

having done这里是做定语.

我认为having done作定语主要是会产生时间上的歧义:having done的东西是延续着、持久着(现在分词短语做定语的内在含义之一),还是已经完结。over the past twenty years时间状语的存在让这重歧义不存在,表明了已经完结,所以是可以这么用的.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

open to discuss.

修正一下观点:

非限制性的having done是可以用的,但是限制性的不能用.

6#
发表于 2009-3-25 14:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用aeoluseros在2009-2-27 18:04:00的发言:

修正一下观点:

非限制性的having done是可以用的,但是限制性的不能用.

为什么非限制性的having done是可以用的,但是限制性的不能用呢?

还想请问一下版主over the past twenty years的位置是否合理呢?

E. Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
    

谢谢

7#
发表于 2009-3-25 15:08:00 | 只看该作者
E的话,我还是觉得语法上没什么问题,就是 改变了 句子 的谓语 结构,因此改变了,句子的表一中心。

要强调 are now drawing conlusion
而是不强调 have amassed knowledge
8#
发表于 2009-3-25 20:49:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢alohabrian

可是我还是不是很明白.. 只能体会出A的强调have amassed knowledge...
不好意思,请问什么是句子的表一中心呢?

谢谢啦
9#
发表于 2009-4-12 20:05:00 | 只看该作者

prep188

A正确

B 除开插入部分,句子变为
        
Neuroscientists and are ….结构错误

C 句子主干是
        
Neuroscientists and are …结构错误

D now drawing
        
改变句子重心,主干部分变成了修饰部分。原句强调的是Neuroscientists are now drawing.

E now drawing
        
改变句子重心,主干部分变成了修饰部分。原句强调的是Neuroscientists are now drawing.

 

10#
发表于 2009-4-18 22:16:00 | 只看该作者

Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

A. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are首先要读懂句意
        
科学家先要amassed很多的knowledge才能够draw solid conclusions这里用having用的很好体现出了动作的先后
        
从逻辑意思上就可以判断出来
        
然后要注意看到状语
        
看到代词要小心

B. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are状语位置的改变产生歧义
        
原先是having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years这里的over the past twenty years是与现在完成时连用的
        
然而B选项改成its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years以为是大脑的发展从出生到成人这20多年的历史 and多余

C. Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are状语位置的改变引起歧义 and多余
        
去掉的have不能体现动作的先后

D. Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,改变句子重心
            

E. Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,改变句子重心

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 16:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部