about "ing"

ca3ltoys · 发表于 2004-3-10 05:25:00

75.    During    her    lecture    the    speaker    used    map    to    clarify    directional    terms,    for    not    everyone    in    attendance    was    knowledgeable    that    winds    are    designated    by    the    direction    from    which    they    come.
(A)    or    not    everyone    in    attendance    was    knowledgeable
(B)    for    everyone    in    attendance    did    not    know
(C)    with    everyone    in    attendance    not    knowing
(D)    with    everyone    attending    not    knowledgeable
(E)    for    not    everyone    attending    knew

the best answer is e, while as to LZM, only the tense is the same, we can use participle, while the answer E here, the tense of main clause is past-"knew", therefore, I think it's wrong, please help me to crack it. thanks

Snazzy · 发表于 2004-3-10 08:05:00

do u have a completel question?

weiyu · 发表于 2004-3-10 10:35:00

"that winds are designated by the direction from which they come " is mentioned as a scientific priciple, therefore the present tense is available.

本题关键：１．部分否定 not all, not everyone. 2. 实意动词》形容词

ca3ltoys · 发表于 2004-3-12 01:42:00

我的意思是根据刘振民讲的如果用现在分词做定语,必须要求其两个动作一致,否则只能用从句,这里用attending修饰not everyone,而后面动词为knew,过去式,时态不一致.

请问怎么讲????

ca3ltoys · 发表于 2004-3-12 06:37:00

UP!高手帮忙看看??

bon · 发表于 2004-3-12 13:22:00

确实是个问题

jnlvo · 发表于 2004-3-12 13:54:00

刘振民的总结太绝对化了，og才是权威。如果og上有这么一说，那确实有问题，只是我好像没看到过。

kid · 发表于 2004-3-12 14:11:00

偶也想知道为什么attending

有这个选项的话，偶会选择for not everyone attended knew

about "ing"

about "ing"

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()