[求助]og 168

4.og 168 today, because of improvements in agricultural technology, the same amount of acreage produces double the apples that it has in 1910.

B)twice as many apples as it did

C)as much as twice the apples it has

d)two times as many apples as there were

E)a doubling of the apples that it did

为什么说a中的that 没有clear referent,不是就近指apples吗？　　E选项中的that 为什么指doubling 而不是就近指带apples

og解释如下:

choice a uses that without a clear referent;

E is illogical ,since that refers to a doubling, E nonsensically asserts that the doubling occured in 1910

1910年的苹果和现在的苹果不是同样的一批苹果，句子要表达的是数量上的是两倍的概念。a选项首先apples作为produce的宾语，说明这个apples是现在的apples。但是用that来作为定语从句中的宾语来指代的话，则是指的是1910年的apples，是不是矛盾呢！类似的问题OG中还出现过，一时想不起来是哪道题了，留意的话你应该会看到的。

非常感谢楼上那两位,尤其是携隐,你还回答了我逻辑的问题

但同样是你,你好象没看清楚og的意思,他说的是,这个that 就指doubling, 原文如下:

E is illogical ,since that refers to a doubling, E nonsensically asserts that the doubling occured in 1910

rather than "本题从语法上来说,that应该指代the same amount,但是从逻辑上来说,that应该指代apples,因此OG解释说它没有clear referent."
but thank you all the same

sorry, probably such a long concentration on the computer makes me dizzy!

说的有道理,OG里面我记得的确有类似的问题. 可以提醒一下楼主,就是那道"东海岸和西海岸的地震"那个题(题号我记不清了)

另外, "the apples that it has in 1910"  如果此处that修饰apple的话, 宾语从句的先行词that应该省略. (根据简洁性原则能省则省)