ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

According to United States census data, while there was about one-third of mothers with young children working outside the home in 1975, in 2000, almost two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5214|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于Which that 指代问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-4-12 06:08:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
看过http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... hlight=That%2Bwhich这个帖子之后产生了一些疑问。
that跟which不同,which前有介宾结构是必须跳跃修饰前面核心词而不是修饰紧邻的名词。that是既可以修饰核心词也可以修饰紧邻的名词,更强调的是逻辑上的关系。这样感觉会出现模糊不清指代不明啊,which必须跳过介宾结构修饰核心词、修饰核心词而不是整个句子目的不就是为了避免这些问题吗,为什么which要求这么严格而that就不这么要求了呢?

thanks in advance
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-12 06:11:13 | 只看该作者
下面是那篇帖子里在关于whose跳跃修饰后面的

------------------------

GWD26-Q24

According to United States census data, while there was about one-third of mothers with young children working outside the home in 1975, in 2000, almost two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home.

A.[font=]while there was about one-third of mothers with young children working outside the home in 1975, in 2000, almost two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home.

B.[font=]there were about one-third of mothers with young children who worked outside the home in 1975; in 2000, almost two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home

C.[font=]in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked outside the home; in 2000, almost two-thirds of such mothers were employed outside the home

D.[font=]even though in 1975 there were about one-third of mothers with young children who worked outside the home, almost two-thirds of such mothers were employed outside the home in 2000

E.[font=]with about one-third of mothers with young children working outside the home in 1975, almost two-thirds of such mothers were employed outside the home in 2000

答案为C,D错在who worked outside 修饰children逻辑错误

-------------------

为什么这里有with介宾结构who却没跳跃?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-12 06:11:29 | 只看该作者
这种例子太多了,到底什么时候对什么时候错呢,再举一个白勇语法第三章48题。

Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang like socks on a clothesline.

A:
D:seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging.
E:seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs have hung.

答案是D。解释说D的非限定性定语从句与其逻辑修饰对象monkeys被隔离墙,只能就近修饰branches。

这不是with介宾结构吗。。咋就被隔离了
地板
发表于 2013-4-12 08:48:54 | 只看该作者
这个可以这么理解,非限制性定语关系代词一般指代最近的名词,但是可能根据后面成分如主语或者谓语判断是否是所谓的跳跃修饰;如在下面这个句子中,
seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs have hung.
这里关系代词后面用词是arms and legs,肯定指代的是一个复数名词,而whose之前的复数名词有branches和monkeys,所以知道branches的嫌疑很大。
但如果这个句子修改成这样:
seen monkeys sleeping on the branch, whose arms and legs have hung.
那么whose指代的就是monkey了..
希望可以帮到你

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-12 11:17:10 | 只看该作者
bejamin1111 发表于 2013-4-12 08:48
这个可以这么理解,非限制性定语关系代词一般指代最近的名词,但是可能根据后面成分如主语或者谓语判断是否 ...

谢谢xd,说的很有道理!不过还是有一个疑问,arms and legs本来就是成双成对的,手脚胳膊腿都是俩,是不是应该就是复数形式呢..
6#
发表于 2013-4-12 14:26:43 | 只看该作者
kimwang53 发表于 2013-4-12 11:17
谢谢xd,说的很有道理!不过还是有一个疑问,arms and legs本来就是成双成对的,手脚胳膊腿都是俩,是不 ...

我觉得指代首先是单纯形式与数的一致,根据这一点确认好指代对象后
再用句子意思去确认是不是符合逻辑,符合那指代就ok。不符合那这个选项也就是incorrect
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-12 18:34:31 | 只看该作者
bejamin1111 发表于 2013-4-12 14:26
我觉得指代首先是单纯形式与数的一致,根据这一点确认好指代对象后
再用句子意思去确认是不是符合逻辑, ...

懂了!谢谢皮特哥
8#
发表于 2013-4-12 18:44:16 | 只看该作者
kimwang53 发表于 2013-4-12 18:34
懂了!谢谢皮特哥

共同进步!
9#
发表于 2016-7-17 20:26:36 | 只看该作者
ron说过 noun1+prep+noun2, which 结构中 which可以指代noun1 or noun2, depend on the context.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 01:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部