GWD12-3

yueqianchen · 发表于 2010-7-23 19:53:44

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.

A.instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse

B.instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight

C.a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight

D.a star would collapse under its own weight

E.its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse

KEY
这答案怎么选出来的？？前面为什么要倒装？我怎么觉得逗号前后两套主谓呢？
谢谢~

yueqianchen · 发表于 2010-7-23 21:33:01

自己顶一下，哪位NN回答一下，不胜感激

loverwy · 发表于 2010-7-23 21:57:59

这句话是虚拟语气。

were it not 其实就是if it were not, 而且只有可能在和现实相反的虚拟语气if从句中，才会出现要用it were 而不是it was.

所以后半句，肯定要用would + do.

再根据原文意思，前面出现了its core, 那么后半句的主语肯定是指代it的，所以不能再出现类似A中的its own weight.

所以选择D

yueqianchen · 发表于 2010-7-23 22:06:05

啧啧，谢谢NN，分析的真好~~

毛毛的臭脚丫 · 发表于 2011-4-20 16:23:31

解释的太好了！

jun383914 · 发表于 2011-6-19 18:59:44

这句话是虚拟语气。

were it not 其实就是if it were not, 而且只有可能在和现实相反的虚拟语气if从句中，才会出现要用it were 而不是it was.

所以后半句，肯定要用would + do.

再根据原文意思，前面出现了its core, 那么后半句的主语肯定是指代it的，所以不能再出现类似A中的its own weight.

所以选择D

-- by 会员 loverwy (2010/7/23 21:57:59)

原来是这样的省略！！！谢谢~~~

ljwqlcl881703 · 发表于 2013-10-6 23:53:16

太好的解释完全解除了我心头虚拟之恨！！！！

wsywsywsy · 发表于 2013-10-7 11:19:35

翻译：
假如不是因为从恒星核心迸发出的核聚变热量和辐射，那么恒星的自身重量会造成它本身的坍塌；
句式：
Were it not for heat and radiation, a star would collapse under its own weigth.
思路：
虚拟语气和主谓一致关系的表达；
选项：
前面it指代后面主句的主语，成了指代its own weight，错误；这样的虚拟语气句子，主句必须一开头就是主语，而不能是连词、副词，因此instead错误；its指代不清
Instead错误同A；本句子描述的是当下的一个假设情形下的一个假设结果，要用现在时态，用would have collapsed表示了"与过去相反(也就是表示过去没崩溃)"不对;
Would have to be collapsing虚拟语气的时态用法错误;
正确；
it指代了its own weight，错误；its指代不清；would have caused错误同B；

GWD12-3

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()