再问大全540

       Nowhere in Prakta is the influence of modern European architecture more apparent than their government buildings.

(A) more apparent than their

(B) so apparent as their

(C) more apparent than in its

(D) so apparent than in their C

(E) as apparent as it is in its

答案没问题。排除法很快可得C。

多想了一下：

这题要是改成正序应该是： The influence of....is more apparent nowhere in Prakta than in its government buildings. 突然觉得 is more apparent nowhere in P很怪？题意是the influence is apparent在某个地方......，所以apparent后用in.....这里显然是nowhere做n. nowhere in Prakta...那么in为什么不是放在nowhere前，而是放在nowhere 后呢？

谢谢指点。

你应该把 more apparent nowhere.....than 一起看.....

(再也没有任何地方比government buildings来得更apparent

就好像 I can't agree you more 一样的道理.....

谢谢狗狗.

再请教:

你的意思是 这个句子的结构应该是 :

The influence of....is (more apparent nowhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings 吗?

那么这里nowhere是做名词还是副词呢?如果是副词的话,修饰哪个的呢?

谢谢先了.

谢谢stoneren.

你这么一正序,逻辑意思和原来是一样的.可nowhere不见了呀?

谢谢指点.

有点类似逻辑中的not；

举个例子：No one can do this. 相当于Everyone cannot do this.

No A is more than B. 相当于B is more than A 或 A is not more than B

逻辑意思上这么改是没错的,可是语法上,我挺困惑nowhere的成分?做名词的话,就该和in P一起看, nowhere in P,可这样的话,怎么apparent in的in不是放在nowhere 前,而是在nowhere后呢?如果象狗狗说的,要把nowhere和前面的no apparent一起看的话,nowhere是什么成分呢?做副词吗?

继续请教中......

同前面stoneren讲的:

The influence of....is not (more apparent everywhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings

至于词性则为副词, 同dashasha