ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6165|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问大全540

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-25 04:02:00 | 只看该作者

再问大全540

       Nowhere in Prakta is the influence of modern European architecture more apparent than their government buildings.



(A) more apparent than their


(B) so apparent as their



(C) more apparent than in its


(D) so apparent than in their C


(E) as apparent as it is in its



答案没问题。排除法很快可得C。


多想了一下:


这题要是改成正序应该是: The influence of....is more apparent nowhere in Prakta than in its government buildings. 突然觉得 is more apparent nowhere in P很怪?题意是the influence is apparent在某个地方......,所以apparent后用in.....这里显然是nowhere做n. nowhere in Prakta...那么in为什么不是放在nowhere前,而是放在nowhere 后呢?


谢谢指点。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-25 4:07:07编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-6-25 06:12:00 | 只看该作者

你应该把 more apparent nowhere.....than 一起看.....


(再也没有任何地方比government buildings来得更apparent


就好像 I can't agree you more 一样的道理.....


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-25 6:15:14编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2004-6-25 06:28:00 | 只看该作者
我想这个句子的正常语序应该是:The influence of modern European architecture is more apparent in Prakta's government buildings than in anywhere else in Prakta. 或 The influence of modern European architecture in prakta's government is more apparent than in anywhere else in Prakta.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-25 06:33:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢狗狗.

再请教:

你的意思是 这个句子的结构应该是 :

The influence of....is (more apparent nowhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings 吗?

那么这里nowhere是做名词还是副词呢?如果是副词的话,修饰哪个的呢?

谢谢先了.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-25 06:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stoneren在2004-6-25 6:28:00的发言:
我想这个句子的正常语序应该是:The influence of modern European architecture is more apparent in Prakta's government buildings than in anywhere else in Prakta. 或 The influence of modern European architecture in prakta's government is more apparent than in anywhere else in Prakta.


谢谢stoneren.


你这么一正序,逻辑意思和原来是一样的.可nowhere不见了呀?


谢谢指点.


6#
发表于 2004-6-25 06:43:00 | 只看该作者

有点类似逻辑中的not;

举个例子:No one can do this. 相当于Everyone cannot do this.

No A is more than B. 相当于B is more than A 或 A is not more than B

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-25 08:40:00 | 只看该作者

逻辑意思上这么改是没错的,可是语法上,我挺困惑nowhere的成分?做名词的话,就该和in P一起看, nowhere in P,可这样的话,怎么apparent in的in不是放在nowhere 前,而是在nowhere后呢?如果象狗狗说的,要把nowhere和前面的no apparent一起看的话,nowhere是什么成分呢?做副词吗?

继续请教中......

8#
发表于 2004-6-25 09:19:00 | 只看该作者
juan mm,我觉得nowhere这里是副词。
9#
发表于 2004-6-25 09:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用juan在2004-6-25 6:33:00的发言:

谢谢狗狗.


再请教:


你的意思是 这个句子的结构应该是 :


The influence of....is (more apparent nowhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings 吗?


那么这里nowhere是做名词还是副词呢?如果是副词的话,修饰哪个的呢?


谢谢先了.


同前面stoneren讲的:

The influence of....is not (more apparent everywhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings

至于词性则为副词, 同dashasha

10#
发表于 2004-6-25 11:31:00 | 只看该作者
偶同意你改的语序:The influence of....is more apparent nowhere in Prakta than in its government buildings.
nowhere是为了强调在prakta的任何地方都不比government buildings 更apparent. 做副词前面不能加介词,就像中学时学的home一样, go home而不是go to home
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-5 08:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部