ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1125|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11紫皮19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-28 07:25:00 | 只看该作者

OG11紫皮19

19. While depressed
                    property values
can hurt some large investors
they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose equity-in many cases representing a life’s savings-can plunge or even disappear.

(A)  they are potentially devastating for homeownerswhose

(B)  they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their

(C)  for homeowners they are potentially devastatingbecause their

(D)  for homeownersit is potentially devastating in that their

(E)  it can potentially devastate homeownerswhose

Rhetorical construction +Agreement

This sentence is correct and conciseThey clearly refers to property valuesand whose refers to homeowners

A  CorrectThe relationship between nouns and pronouns is correct in this sentencethe

 expression is concise and clear

B  Can potentially is redundantin that there is wordy, awkwardand ambiguous

C  Their appears to refer to they(property values) rather than to homeowners

D  It does not agree with property valuesin that their is wordy and awkward

E  It does not agree with property valuescan potentially is redundant

The correct answer is A


they難道不能指代some large investors嗎?如何才算是指代清楚?請指教

沙发
发表于 2008-6-28 10:07:00 | 只看该作者
可是D and E有更明顯的錯誤 - it沒有指代的對象.
在A, B and C當中, 有都有they, 所以都有指代問題.
可是obviously, 一定有一個是對的.
在這情況下, 只能choose比較好的A.
個人意見: 用"指代不清"來排除choice有點hard...因為很多人都有不同的definition, 可是還沒有一套是100% works for GMAT.
板凳
发表于 2008-6-28 10:12:00 | 只看该作者
oh...忘記說, 在while/although/even though的從句主語一般都是主句中的主語.
所以妳會frequently見到while/although/even though的主語跟"to be"被omitted...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 10:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部