大全626

1.       Scorched by fire, stained by water, and inscribed in cramped handwriting, the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, depending instead on English sources for information.

(A) the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, depending

(B) the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, who depended

(C) historians long ignored the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City, depending

(D) historians long ignored the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City and depended（B）

(E) historians long ignored the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City, they depended

   这道题开始我选e。请问e错是不是因为改变强调对象呀？

现在分词位于句末或句首，前后有“，”将其与主句隔开，则现在分词优先做主句谓语的伴随状语，伴随动作方式，动作本身以及动作结果。

所以,depending这里应该修饰ignored ，有歧异，所以不选Ａ。

不知道按这句话解释对不对，可以基本认为是定律吗？

请ＮＮ指点

不太同意这个说法. Scorched by fire, stained by water, and inscribed in cramped handwriting, the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, depending instead on English sources for information.

A错误的原因: 有非谓语动词引导的一个伴随状语修饰前面的东东.

还原成一个句子就是: the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City  depend instead on English sources for information

语态不对

A,B之间的区别还是不明白，楼上的两个谁说的对啊？？？？？

大全注释说depending修饰对象不清，为什么不清啊？？？

哪位g友解释一下，谢谢