大全626

winsx2008

1.       Scorched by fire, stained by water, and inscribed in cramped handwriting, the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, depending instead on English sources for information.

(A) the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, depending

(B) the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, who depended

(C) historians long ignored the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City, depending

(D) historians long ignored the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City and depended（B）

(E) historians long ignored the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City, they depended

   这道题开始我选e。请问e错是不是因为改变强调对象呀？

lilyzy

Scorched by fire, stained by water, and inscribed in cramped handwriting, 这些都应该是修饰documents, 而不是historians.

winsx2008

明白了， 谢谢

superdino

A项有什么错误？DEPENDING不可以分词修饰HISTORIAN吗？

feiqtx

现在分词位于句末或句首，前后有“，”将其与主句隔开，则现在分词优先做主句谓语的伴随状语，伴随动作方式，动作本身以及动作结果。

所以,depending这里应该修饰ignored ，有歧异，所以不选Ａ。

不知道按这句话解释对不对，可以基本认为是定律吗？

请ＮＮ指点

superdino

MM说的很对，看来GMAT考试中，逗号加句末的分词只考---伴随

cocomalawi

现在分词位于句末或句首，前后有“，”将其与主句隔开，则现在分词优先做主句谓语的伴随状语，伴随动作方式，动作本身以及动作结果。

所以,depending这里应该修饰ignored ，有歧异，所以不选Ａ。

不知道按这句话解释对不对，可以基本认为是定律吗？

请ＮＮ指点

不太同意这个说法. Scorched by fire, stained by water, and inscribed in cramped handwriting, the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City were long ignored by historians, depending instead on English sources for information.

A错误的原因: 有非谓语动词引导的一个伴随状语修饰前面的东东.

还原成一个句子就是: the seventeenth-century Dutch documents on the beginnings of New York City  depend instead on English sources for information

语态不对

oremping

A?B ?

不明白......

明白......

rpch2004

A,B之间的区别还是不明白，楼上的两个谁说的对啊？？？？？

大全注释说depending修饰对象不清，为什么不清啊？？？

哪位g友解释一下，谢谢

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-14 16:01:39编辑过]

rpch2004

up等待中