[求助]这篇文章如何套七宗罪？谢谢！

siebel · 发表于 2003-7-25 07:02:00

如果遇到不知道怎么套七宗罪的题目，怎么办？比如这篇aa40：

欧只能归纳出第一宗：unfairly assume。那第三段、第四段写什么呢？好像其他的比如analogy, after this and therefor because of this, wrong evidence都用不上呢。怎么办？谢谢！

The following appeared as part of an article in a weekly newsmagazine.
“The country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade deficit problem by lowering the price of sugar, its primary export. Such an action would make Sacchar better able to compete for markets with other sugar-exporting countries. The sale of Sacchar’s sugar abroad would increase, and this increase would substantially reduce Sacchar’s trade deficit.”

Rose · 发表于 2003-7-25 12:01:00

以下是引用siebel在2003-7-25 7:02:00的发言：
如果遇到不知道怎么套七宗罪的题目，怎么办？比如这篇aa40：

欧只能归纳出第一宗：unfairly assume。那第三段、第四段写什么呢？好像其他的比如analogy, after this and therefor because of this, wrong evidence都用不上呢。怎么办？谢谢！

The following appeared as part of an article in a weekly newsmagazine.
“The country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade deficit problem by lowering the price of sugar, its primary export. Such an action would make Sacchar better able to compete for markets with other sugar-exporting countries. The sale of Sacchar’s sugar abroad would increase, and this increase would substantially reduce Sacchar’s trade deficit.”

I will attack the arguement this way:

This argument rests on three unscrupulous asssumptions.

1. Assumption that lowering the price of sugar will necessarily lead to increased sale
of Sacchar in abroad market.

2. Assumption that lowering the price of sugar will automatically confer Sachhar a
competitive advantage.

3. Even the previously stated assumptions are well supported, it is still premature to
predict that the increased sales will reduce the deficit, because deficit is also determined by factors other than increased export revenue.

anchoret · 发表于 2003-7-25 12:54:00

真不错。

siebel · 发表于 2003-7-25 22:00:00

thanks so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sunnyharuko · 发表于 2007-7-6 01:33:00

哇。牛人！

nymph · 发表于 2007-7-24 11:41:00

Good job!

Just like Rose's ideas.

只有一条，unwarranted assumptions,也是可以写出好几段的啊：）

yieven · 发表于 2007-7-25 18:09:00

以下是引用siebel在2003-7-25 7:02:00的发言：
如果遇到不知道怎么套七宗罪的题目，怎么办？比如这篇aa40：

The following appeared as part of an article in a weekly newsmagazine.
“The country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade deficit problem by lowering the price of sugar, its primary export. Such an action would make Sacchar better able to compete for markets with other sugar-exporting countries. The sale of Sacchar’s sugar abroad would increase, and this increase would substantially reduce Sacchar’s trade deficit.”

啊,这道题用国金的知识来看还是满容易的呀.~（我找了一堆理由，汗）

一降价就必然使得sale increase么?不一定.首先,如果出口供给已经过饱和了,降价对需求没有刺激作用,反而会损失~其次,就算降价使出口量上升,也不一定能保证sale increase除非作者给出证据出口量的扩大带来的收益能offset价格的下降所带来的损失~(这个就涉及到价格弹性的问题了……我只是插一句）

二降价能使它better able to compete for markets么？如果被消费者认为是质量下降了或者其他什么变差了的原因不是适得其反么？（虽然从道理上讲，sugar应该不会。不过msCR里专门出这种东东）如果被别国认为倾销制裁怎么办？如果别国征收高关税怎么办？（这个可以算在他因里）如果别国也同样降价怎么办？（同样CR里的伎俩）

三降价能substantially reduce Sacchar’s trade deficit么？首先，trade deficit不只由export决定而由import和export共同决定。就算export sale increase，如果import的增加超过它，还是不能减少赤字。其次，substantially不能保证。。。。。

好象还有一大堆错误，不过我觉得上面的就够了。

BTW累死我了~~

我的思路好乱啊，有人看了抓狂不要扁我，汗~~~~~~~~~

[求助]这篇文章如何套七宗罪？谢谢！

[求助]这篇文章如何套七宗罪？谢谢！

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块