[求助]天山-3-2

As the honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing the bee to sustain a fatal injury.

a As the honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing

b As the heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes  

c honeybee’s stinger, heavily barbed and staying where it is inserted, results in the fact that the act of stinging causes

d the heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, and results in the act of stinging causing

e the honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

the correct answer is c, but I chose E

anyone could help me?

I think C: the logic relationship is not right,  it is not the stinger causes the fact but the act of the stinger causes the fact

HELP!!!!!!

很久没看了，上来胡说两句。

E里面有两个地方我觉得不太好。第一，and前后连接系表结构和一般现在时，不是很对称，不平行。第二，with the result是个啰嗦的说法，ETS不喜欢。

至于C的逻辑关系，原句的意思应该是：因为小蜜的刺是怎么怎么样的，所以导致了怎么怎么样。所以我觉得逻辑上用stinger做主语没错，主语应该不是the act of stinging。

对，我记得OG上没有前后时态语态不一致的平行。

这个逻辑的理解有点因人而异，建议先从语法点入手。

这种平行是可以的，rohd GG

今天做题时遇到了一道。。。

估计这个题就是with结构多余了。。。

哦，是吗，可能是我记错了... mm加油！

我也遇到这个问题，总觉得E的逻辑比C好……

后来又仔细看了下，发现E比C多了个the，可能这个the也容易引起歧义吧。是“特定的蜜蜂”还是“特定的刺”呢？

with the result that是出现必错吗？

不得不承认，C的句子结构最为工整，看来真不应该先去想什么逻辑问题。

恩选了D，死抠在 action－－－导致 result， 而非，sting导致上头；

回头看，D其实这层逻辑意思也不够清晰，and除非死活说成在这里表因果，

否则一般理解and的并列功能，“stays ... and results ...causing”,因果在这里搞并列，也太奇怪了。

“and results in the act of stinging causing”整个觉得繁冗。

以防有人没找到，这题的疯狂讨论贴:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=1051819&id=84560&page=1&skin=0&Star=1