ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1211|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

L2004-6-B16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-29 04:34:00 | 只看该作者

L2004-6-B16

I have another question which i dont quite agree with the answer. Any explanation is highly appreciated!

16. Environmentalist: Many people prefer to live in regions
of natural beauty. Such regions often experience
an influx of new residents, and a growing
population encourages businesses to relocate to
those regions. Thus, governmentally mandated
environmental protection in regions of natural
beauty can help those regions’ economies overall,
even if such protection harms some older local
industries.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which
the environmentalist’s argument depends?
(A) Regions of natural beauty typically are beautiful
enough to attract new residents only until
governmentally mandated environmental
protection that damages local industries is
imposed.
(B) The economies of most regions of natural
beauty are not based primarily on local
industries that would be harmed by
governmentally mandated environmental
protection.
(C) If governmentally mandated environmental
protection helps a region’s economy, it does so
primarily by encouraging people to move into
that region.
(D) Voluntary environmental protection usually does
not help a region’s economy to the degree that
governmentally mandated protection does.
(E) A factor harmful to some older local industries
in a region need not discourage other
businesses from relocating to that region.

I think B is also right. Compared with B, why E is more correct? Should we compare among the answers and find out the most correct answer, which means there will be more than one correct answer, whereas we should pick up the most correct one?

Thanks in advance!

沙发
发表于 2006-9-29 12:25:00 | 只看该作者

economies includes 1. relocated businesses and 2. older local industries.

protection helps economies OVERALL

protection harms 2.older local industries

Answer B only proves the economies are not based on 2 but didn't provide evidence of relationship between protection and 1

板凳
发表于 2006-10-24 05:48:00 | 只看该作者

To Lifechaser

B is way off.

Dont lose focus on the stem. No where does the stem talk about general bussiness condition in MOST areas of natual beauty.  B might strik you as correct because of its tone and vibe are very similar to the stem. Watch out for this type of wrong answer choices.

I thought this one was pretty straightforward.

The conclusion: governmentally mandated environmental protection in regions of natural beauty can help those regions’ economies overall, even if such protection harms some older local industries.

It's clear the argument doesnt think the new measure will affect the new business adversely.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 01:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部