885-14-16

jeffyang · 发表于 2003-11-17 21:16:00

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

Answer

A)
我覺得(C)也可以 , why ?
thanks ...

bettyofarim · 发表于 2003-11-17 21:35:00

called proton-induced x-ray emission 应该紧跟在修饰词后（a technique ），如果向C这样，called proton-induced x-ray emission 就变成修air pollutants了

jeffyang · 发表于 2003-11-17 21:49:00

以下是引用bettyofarim在2003-11-17 21:35:00的发言：
called proton-induced x-ray emission 应该紧跟在修饰词后（a technique ），如果向C这样，called proton-induced x-ray emission 就变成修air pollutants了

感謝感謝！

bigmouse · 发表于 2005-3-18 18:22:00

A虽然正确，但我有点疑问，which从句是不是有点修饰不清呢，它可以修饰technology也可以修饰emission？请大家执教！！多谢！！

ford424 · 发表于 2005-3-23 01:14:00

同问, 为什么说这里which可以跳越修饰, 而都是做后置成分的called不行?!

迷惑了一阵子了, 对于这个要命的跳来跳去.

感谢!!!

ford424 · 发表于 2005-3-23 16:08:00

ford424 · 发表于 2005-3-24 12:40:00

up!先谢过了

小女公子 · 发表于 2005-3-25 14:56:00

a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission

technique是中心词，被非限定性定于从句which修饰

C，which要想修饰tecnique太远了，中间隔了太长串。

一般来说，限定性修饰都不跳。我觉得。非限定性看逻辑意思。尚在总结中。不敢保证。

a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission，which修饰technique还是emission都可以，我觉得。

她叫张曼玉，who is a beauty。她和张都是一个人嘛……哈哈~~

ethyl · 发表于 2005-5-1 22:36:00

俺觉得小女公子的总结需要慎重呀，限制性定语从句可以跳跃修饰滴，这个毫无疑问……

zenger · 发表于 2005-8-25 13:42:00

以下是引用bigmouse在2005-3-18 18:22:00的发言：
A虽然正确，但我有点疑问，which从句是不是有点修饰不清呢，它可以修饰technology也可以修饰emission？请大家执教！！多谢！！

我也一直认为这里的which有点修饰不清。

但是我的理解是这样的：由于前面是 sth1 is called sth2., which修饰sth2时，也是一样可以的（意思没有变）．这有点类似于系表结构．

而called ....在Ｃ所带来的歧义更为严重．

本贴相关题目 OG-2016-SC-122OG-2016-SC-122
OG-2015-SC-106
OG-13-SC-106
OG-12-SC-107
... (DRXS)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

885-14-16

885-14-16

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2016-SC-122OG-2016-SC-122OG-2015-SC-106OG-13-SC-106OG-12-SC-107 ... (DRXS)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

885-14-16

885-14-16

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2016-SC-122OG-2016-SC-122
OG-2015-SC-106
OG-13-SC-106
OG-12-SC-107
... (DRXS)