ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (OUFZ)

00:00:00

Domestic automobile manufacturers have invested millions of dollars into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road.

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1418|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og112悬而未决得问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-1-24 13:11:00 | 只看该作者

og112悬而未决得问题

112. Domestic automobile manufacturers have invested millions of dollars into research to develop cars more
gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road.
(A) into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road
(B) into research for developing even more gasoline-efficient cars on the road than at present
(C) for research for cars to be developed that are more gasoline-efficient even than presently the road
(D) in research to develop cars even more gasoline-efficient than those at present on the road
(E) in research for developing cars that are even more gasoline-efficient than presently on the road


答案d选出来不难而且没有疑问


难得是如何理解解释中


In A, the phrase
more gasoline-efficient ... than presently on the road does not identify the second term of the comparison.


C and E again fail to indicate the second term of the comparison.


ACE都是than后没有比较对象


In
B, the misuse of modifying phrases produces an ambiguous and awkward statement: even more
gasoline-efficient cars could refer either to more cars that are efficient or to cars that are more efficient.


而b是比较对象有歧义


但b后面也没有比较对象啊,意思是不是b不仅没有比较对象,而且比较对象有歧异那?


如何区分,看以前讨论没有定论

沙发
发表于 2006-1-24 13:35:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得B的后面的比较对象省略了,所以比较对象不明确,引起歧义,而不是没有比较对象。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-1-24 14:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用carolhide在2006-1-24 13:35:00的发言:
我觉得B的后面的比较对象省略了,所以比较对象不明确,引起歧义,而不是没有比较对象。

那ace就不是省略比较对象吗?

地板
发表于 2006-1-24 14:28:00 | 只看该作者
A,C,E有补出修饰试图明确修饰对象,但是fail to identify
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-1-24 15:45:00 | 只看该作者

明白了


非常感谢

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-1-25 08:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用carolhide在2006-1-24 14:28:00的发言:
A,C,E有补出修饰试图明确修饰对象,但是fail to identify


感谢你一直回答我的问题,今天又看了一下想在追问一下怎么理解 :A,C,E有补出修饰试图明确修饰对象,但是fail to identify


7#
发表于 2006-1-25 13:39:00 | 只看该作者

A,E后面有on the road


C后面有the road


这个就是补出修饰试图明确修饰对象


个人意见!

8#
发表于 2007-5-12 17:57:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 20:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部