ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1630|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-9-4-21

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-1 05:31:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-9-4-21

Questions 20-21


So-called environmentalists have argued that the proposed Golden Lake Development would interfere with bird-migration patterns. However, the fact that these same people have raised environmental objections to virtually every development proposal brought before the council in recent years indicates that their expressed concern for bird-migration patterns is nothing but a mask for their antidevelopment, antiprogress agenda. Their claim, therefore, should be dismissed without further consideration.


21.   For the claim that the concern expressed by the so-called environmentalists is not their real concern to be properly drawn on the basis of the evidence cited, which one of the following must be assumed?


(A) Not every development proposal opposed in recent years by these so-called environmentalists was opposed because they believed it to pose a threat to the environment.


(B) People whose real agenda is to block development wherever it is proposed always try to disguise their true motives.


(C) Anyone who opposes unrestricted development is an opponent of progress.


(D) The council has no reason to object to the proposed Golden Lake Development other than concern about the development’s effect on bird-migration patterns.A


(E) When people say that they oppose a development project solely on environmental grounds, their real concern almost always lies elsewhere.



这个问题我看不懂。


是问envionmentalists 's concern is not their real concern 这个结论的前提?


答案:不是所有的提议这些envionmentalists 都反对的,也就是说他们也可能会赞同一些提议的,而不是想文章中说的,他们反对所有的提议。这好像是在削弱文章的观点啊?

沙发
发表于 2005-1-1 13:02:00 | 只看该作者

是问 so-called En 并不真的关心环境的claim成立基于哪个假设?

我觉得你对A的理解有问题,对A取非,就变为所有的so-called En反对的proposal实际上是真正的环境问题,即他们真正关心环境,对原文削弱。not + weaken.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-2 03:36:00 | 只看该作者

I see. (A) Not every development proposal opposed in recent years by these so-called environmentalists was opposed because they believed it to pose a threat to the environment.

in another wrod, sometimes, even though environmentalists believed the proposal not pose a threat, they still oppose the proposal, so we can conclude that their real concern is antiprogress.

wow, I still need to prove my understanding for long sentences!

Thanks hades!

地板
发表于 2006-4-22 11:08:00 | 只看该作者
削弱削弱削弱
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-11 18:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部