[讨论]杨鹏难句 30句

^{Perhaps the fact that many of these first studies considered only algae of a size that could be collected in a net(net phytoplankton), a pratice that overlooked the smaller phytoplankton (nannoplankton)
                                that we now know grazers are most likely to feed on, led to a de-emphasis of the role of grazers in subsequent research.}

^{书中的解释说fact后跟的是一个定语从句，但是我个人认为应该是同位语从句。如果是定语从句，fact应当在从句中充当一定的成份，可是好像在从句中并不能找到适合fact的位置。感觉同位语从句更能解释的通一些。}

^{不知各位有什么想法，谢谢！}

谢谢，不过我还是不能认同你的观点：（

第一，“首先， 楼主认为fact应该在THAT后面的从句中充当一定的功能是吧？  我认识这是错误的， 从功能上来看，定语从句对它修饰的名词起限定说明的作用，肯定不会为后面的从句充当句子成份。”我的概念中，定语从句修饰一个名词，名词要在从句中充当成份的，比如the fact that we know，这个简单的句子中，fact其实充当了we know的宾语。再举个例子，the fact that lead us to misunderstanding...，这里fact又做了从句的主语。

第二，“ 另外，为不是同位语从句呢， 这也从同位语从句的形式上来看，如果是它是同位语从句的话， 跟在THAT后面的“ many of these first studies”     一定和fact是同一概念， 它们是一个东西才行， 有点类似于同意词， 显然， that后面的名词加谓语动词联合起来修饰 fact, 一句话修饰一个词， 这不是同位语从句了。”  这里，我觉得并不是that后面的名词加谓语动词联合起来修饰了fact,而是^{many of these first studies considered only algae of a size that could be collected in a net(net phytoplankton), a pratice that overlooked the smaller phytoplankton (nannoplankton)
                        that we now know grazers are most likely to feed on整个这句话解释了fact，即事实是许多研究只考虑了能在net中收集的size的algae。而同位语从句的一个特点是可以转化为表语从句，这样，转化后这个句子就变成the fact is that many of these first studies considered only algae of a size that could be collected in a net(net phytoplankton), a pratice that overlooked the smaller phytoplankton (nannoplankton)
                        that we now know grazers are most likely to feed on。句子结构是完整的}

^{这里也许可以看一个简单的类似例句，比如the fact that many Chinease students want to go abroad for further study这里我觉得that后面仍然是同位语从句，而不是定语从句}

up

没人理：（