ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3702|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[排名] 2022金融时报全球MBA排名 (Financial Times Global MBA Ranking 2022)

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2022-2-14 10:37:30 来自手机 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

2022 年 2 月 14 日,英国《金融时报》(Financial Times,以下简称“FT”)发布了 2022 MBA 百强排行榜,即刻为大家揭晓排名结果。附件中的 PDF 包含了排名各项指标的得分。

更详细的排名各项指标的得分,请下载附件 PDF:

Rank
2022
Rank
2021
3 Yr
Avg.
School Name Country
1 - - University of Pennsylvania: Wharton US
2 - - Columbia Business School US
3= 1 3 Insead FR / SG
3= - - Harvard Business School US
5 6 7 Northwestern University: Kellogg US
6 - - Stanford Graduate School of Business US
7 3 7 University of Chicago: Booth US
8 2 6 London Business School UK
9 4 9 Yale School of Management US
10 4 9 Iese Business School Spain
11= 7 9 HEC Paris France
11= - - MIT: Sloan US
13 12 18 SDA Bocconi School of Management Italy
14= 13 16 New York University: Stern US
14= - - University of California at Berkeley: Haas US
16 7 9 Ceibs China
17 15 18 Cornell University: Johnson US
18 10 15 Dartmouth College: Tuck US
19 9 15 Duke University: Fuqua US
20 11 16 University of Virginia: Darden US
21 14 17 National University of Singapore Business School Singapore
22 16 19 University of Cambridge: Judge UK
23 27 27 Carnegie Mellon: Tepper US
24 21 25 University of Michigan: Ross US
25 24 28 University of Southern California: Marshall US
26 - - UCLA Anderson School of Management US
27 17 25 Georgetown University: McDonough US
28 19 24 IMD Business School Switzerland
29 25 33 Washington University: Olin US
30 28 35 University of Washington: Foster US
31 17 23 University of Oxford: Saïd UK
32= 23 28 Indian School of Business India
32= 32 32 Fudan University School of Management China
34= 20 26 Esade Business School Spain
34= 44 44 Imperial College Business School UK
36 22 26 HKUST Business School Hong Kong
37 56 55 Ohio State University: Fisher US
38 26 34 University of North Carolina: Kenan-Flagler US
39 37 37 Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore Singapore
40 39 44 IE Business School Spain
41 31 39 Vanderbilt University: Owen US
42 - - Peking University: Guanghua China
43= 30 39 Alliance Manchester Business School UK
43= 40 39 University of Florida: Warrington US
45 50 47 Emory University: Goizueta US
46 40 42 University of Texas at Austin: McCombs US
47 32 45 Rice University: Jones US
48 60 61 University of Rochester: Simon US
49 42 52 University of California at Irvine: Merage US
50 48 49 CUHK Business School Hong Kong
51 58 57 Singapore Management University: Lee Kong Chian Singapore
52 - - ESCP Business School FR / UK / DE
ES / IT
53 35 38 Indian Institute of Management Bangalore India
54 69 60 University of Notre Dame: Mendoza US
55 62 57 Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business US
56 38 45 Indiana University: Kelley US
57 32 44 Warwick Business School UK
58 53 49 Shanghai Jiao Tong University: Antai China
59 29 48 HKU Business School Hong Kong
60= 47 55 Pennsylvania State University: Smeal US
60= 67 - Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management China
62 48 57 Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad India
63 51 60 Boston University: Questrom US
64 81 78 Essec Business School France
65= 35 51 Sungkyunkwan University GSB South Korea
65= 46 57 Babson College: Olin US
65= - - Tongji University School of Economics and Management China
68 44 51 Indian Institute of Management Calcutta India
69= 61 60 City, University of London: Bayes (formerly Cass) UK
69= 68 69 George Washington University US
69= 86 - Rutgers Business School US
72 58 67 Mannheim Business School Germany
73 76 79 Edhec Business School France
74 54 64 WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management Germany
75 57 - Arizona State University: WP Carey US
76= 64 69 University of St Gallen Switzerland
76= 55 - Boston College: Carroll US
76= 96 - Lancaster University Management School UK
79 75 83 University of Toronto: Rotman Canada
80 87 89 University of Georgia: Terry US
81 73 78 University of Texas at Dallas: Jindal US
82= 71 77 University of Minnesota: Carlson US
82= 76 77 University of Pittsburgh: Katz US
82= 71 79 Brigham Young University: Marriott US
85 52 70 University of Maryland: Smith US
86 63 72 Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Netherlands
87 83 87 Wisconsin School of Business US
88 80 83 ESMT Berlin Germany
89 90 86 EMLyon Business School France
90 91 91 McGill University: Desautels Canada
91 - - Politecnico di Milano School of Management Italy
92 97 92 Western University: Ivey Canada
93 93 93 Miami Herbert Business School US
94 89 - William & Mary: Mason US
95 74 77 Durham University Business School UK
96 85 89 Texas A&M University: Mays US
97 87 88 Melbourne Business School Australia
98 79 88 AGSM at UNSW Business School Australia
99 100 - Queen's University: Smith Canada
100 84 - Ipade Business School Mexico

Table Notes

Footnotes: * KPMG reported on the results of obtaining evidence and applying specified audit procedures relating to selected survey data provided for the Financial Times 2022 MBA ranking for selected business schools. Enquiries about the assurance process can be made by contacting Lori Huber of KPMG at lahuber@kpmg.ca. The specified audit procedures were carried out between October and November 2021. The audit date published denotes the survey for which the specified audit procedures were conducted.

** Data in this column are for information only and are not used in the rankings. 

‡   Harvard does not have a school advisory board.

Please note the Covid pandemic has limited global travel which has an impact on the international course experience rank.

Some 196 points separate the top programme, at University of   Pennsylvania: Wharton, from the school, ranked 100. The schools are divided into four tiers. Business schools in tiers l and ll score above the average for the cohort, and tiers lll and lV are below it. The difference in scores between schools ranked consecutively is greater within tiers l and lV than in tiers ll and lll. Tier l includes 16 schools from University of Pennsylvania:   Wharton to Ceibs. Tier ll includes schools from Cornell University: Johnson,   ranked 17, to Vanderbilt University: Owen at 41. Tier lll, headed by Peking   University: Guanghua, spans schools ranked 42 to 80. Tier lV includes schools from University of Texas at Dallas: Jindal at 81 to Ipade Business School at 100.

Download the full ranking as a PDF

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2022-2-14 11:43:25 | 只看该作者

排名指标及方法

This Financial Times MBA ranking features the world's best 100 full-time MBA programmes. A total of 151 schools took part in the 2022 edition. All participating schools meet the FT's entry criteria and are accredited by Equis or the AACSB.

The FT surveys alumni three years after completing their MBA. For schools to enter the ranking calculations, the FT requires that a minimum of 20 per cent of alumni reply to the survey, with at least 20 fully completed surveys.

This year, because of disruption from the Covid-19 crisis, the FT considered schools with a lower response rate. A total of 7,138 alumni from the class of 2018 completed our survey — a response rate of 34 per cent.

The ranking has 20 criteria. Alumni responses inform eight criteria that together contribute 61 per cent of its weight. Eleven criteria are calculated from school data, accounting for 29 per cent of the ranking. KPMG audits a number of schools every year. The remaining criterion, the research rank, counts for 10 per cent.

Alumni-informed criteria are based on the data collected over three years. Responses from the 2022 survey carry 50 per cent of total weight and those from 2021 and 2020, 25 per cent each. If only two years of data are available, the weighting is split 60:40 if data are from 2022 and 2021, or 70:30 if they are from 2022 and 2020. For salary figures, the weighting is 50:50 for two years'data.

The first two alumni criteria are average income three years after completion and salary increase compared with pre-MBA salary, each weighted at 20 per cent. For the latter, half of the weight applies to the absolute increase and half to the percentage rise (published). Current salaries are converted to US dollars using IMF purchasing power parity rates.

The salaries of non-profit and public-sector workers and full-time students are removed, as are the highest and lowest salaries from each school, to calculate a normalised average. Finally, salaries are weighted to reflect differences between different sectors.

“Value for money” for each school is calculated by dividing their average alumni salary three years after completion by their MBA's total cost, including tuition, lost salary, opportunity cost and other expenses. Any scholarship assistance given to alumni is subtracted from the total.

The FT also collects information from schools on their current faculty, newly enrolled students and the latest completing class. School criteria include the diversity of staff, board members and students by gender, citizenship and the MBA&'s international reach. For gender criteria, schools with a 50:50 composition score highest.

The research rank is based on the number of articles by full-time faculty in 50 internationally recognised academic and practitioner journals. The rank combines the number of publications from January 2019 to July 2021, with the number weighted relative to faculty size.

The environmental, social and governance rank is based on the proportion of teaching hours from core courses dedicated to ESG topics. It carries a weight of 3 per cent.

The MBA ranking is a relative listing. Schools are ranked against each other by calculating a Z-score for each criterion. The Z-score is a statistic that shows where a score lies in relation to the mean. These scores are then weighted as outlined in the ranking key and added together for a final score.

After removing schools that did not meet the response rate threshold from the alumni survey, a first version is calculated. The school at the bottom is removed and a second version is calculated and so on until we reach the top 100. The top 100 schools are ranked accordingly to produce the 2022 list.

Key (weights for ranking criteria are shown in brackets as a percentage)

Salary today**: average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent. This figure is not used in the ranking.#

Weighted salary (20): average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent (see methodology, page 31), with adjustment for variations between sectors.#

Salary increase (20): average difference in alumni salary from before the MBA to now. Half of this figure is calculated according to the absolute salary increase and half according to the percentage increase relative to pre-MBA salary.#

Value for money (3): calculated using salary today, course length, tuition and other costs, including lost income during the MBA.#

Career progress (3): calculated according to changes in the level of seniority and the size of the organisation alumni work in now, compared with before their MBA.#

Aims achieved (3): the extent to which alumni fulfilled their stated goals or reasons for doing an MBA.#

Careers service (3): effectiveness of the school careers service for career counselling, personal development, networking events, internship search and recruitment, as rated by their alumni.#

Employed at three months (2): percentage of the most recent completing class which found employment or accepted a job offer within three months of completing their studies. The figure in brackets is the percentage of the class for which the school was able to provide employment data and is used to calculate the school's final score.§

Alumni recommend (3): calculated according to selection by alumni of three schools from which they would recruit MBA graduates.#

Female faculty (2): percentage of female faculty.

Female students (2): percentage of female students on the full-time MBA.

Women on board (1): percentage of female members on the school's advisory board.

International faculty (4): calculated according to the diversity of faculty by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their location of employment — the figure published in the table.

International students (4): calculated according to the diversity of current MBA students by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from the location in which they study — the figure in the table.

International board (2): percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the location in which the school is based.

International mobility (6): based on alumni citizenship and the locations where they worked before their MBA, on completion and three years after.

International course experience (3): calculated according to whether the most recent completing MBA class carried out exchanges and internships, lasting at least a month, in locations other than where the school is based. The calculation was based on the average across the past three years of international course experience data, taken from the 2022, 2021 and 2020 surveys. Virtual experiences are excluded. Covid has limited travel.

Extra languages (1): number of languages required on graduation, excluding English.§

Faculty with doctorates (5): percentage of full-time faculty with a doctoral degree.

FT research rank (10): calculated according to the number of articles published by current full-time faculty members in 50 selected academic and practitioner journals between January 2019 and July 2021. The FT50 rank combines the absolute number of publications with the number weighted relative to the faculty's size.

ESG rank (3): proportion of teaching hours from core courses dedicated to environmental, social and governance issues.

Overall satisfaction**: average evaluation by alumni of the course, scored out of 10. After alumni answered various questions about their MBA experience, they were asked to rate their overall satisfaction, on a 10-point scale. This figure is not used in the ranking.

Footnotes

  • Schools with a 50:50 (male/female) composition receive the highest possible score in the three gender-related criteria.
  • § Alumni who completed MBA between July 2020 and June 2021.
  • # Includes data for the class of 2018 and one or two preceding classes where available.
  • ** Category not used in the ranking.

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT's database consultant. The FT research rank was calculated using Clarivate data covering 50 journals selected by FT from the Web of Science, an abstract and citation database of research literature.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-19 15:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部