ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4388|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于 ALTHOUGH 的省略 问题, 应怎么省?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-28 15:46:00 | 只看该作者

关于 ALTHOUGH 的省略 问题, 应怎么省?

1.        Despite no proof that the consumption of any particular foods reverse hardening of the arteries, studies indicate that refraining from eating certain foods could help reverse blockage of coronary arteries, the blood vessels that feed the heart.


(A) Despite no proof that the consumption of any particular foods reverse hardening of the arteries, studies indicate that refraining from eating certain foods could


(B) Despite no foods having been proved to reverse hardening of the arteries when consumed, studies indicate that refraining from eating certain foods can


(C) Although the consumption of no particular foods have been proved to reverse hardening of the arteries, studies indicate that to refrain from eating certain foods could


(D) Although not proved that the consumption of any foods reverse hardening of the arteries, studies indicate that refraining from eating certain foods canE


(E) Although it has not been proved that the consumption of any particular food will reverse hardening of the arteries, studies indicate that refraining from eating certain foods can


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-28 15:53:41编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-28 15:50:00 | 只看该作者

我的 问题是 若把D 改成 :


D) Although not proved that the consumption of any foods reverses hardening of the arteries, studies indicate that refraining from eating certain foods can  对吗 ?


  Although 等的省略,怎么用阿?  

板凳
发表于 2006-4-28 16:19:00 | 只看该作者
1。把D改成什么?没看出来你改的地方。

2。这句句子前后有转折意思,although不能省,除非后半句出现but/however才能省掉前面的although。

3。或者我是没看明白你这个帖的意思,能再说说清楚吗?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-28 16:34:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢 rosmarine


我 是说 若 不管 D的主谓一致 问题


  although  和 not proved 中间 的省略,因该 怎么省? D 选项的省略对吗?


5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-28 16:36:00 | 只看该作者

1还有这道题:


.        Once the economic and social usefulness of the motor car was demonstrated and with its superiority to the horse being proved, much of the early hostility to it in rural regions disappeared.


(A) and with its superiority to the horse being


(B) and its superiority over the horse had been


(C) and its superiority to the horse


(D) its superiority over the horseC


(E) with its superiority to the horse having been



答案C说是 proved 前 省略了 was,  为什么 可以这样省/?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-28 16:36:11编辑过]
6#
发表于 2006-4-28 17:05:00 | 只看该作者
第一道题的D是错误选项,错在although和not proved之间省略了it has not been,也就是省略了主语和谓语,只剩下not proved的分词结构,这就使得that没有所指。that作为同位语从句的引导词必须指向一个主体词,如E里的that指向形式主语it,这样句子就符合语法了。

第二道题我不太确定是什么语法规则,只是按我自己的理解,was之所以可以省略是因为前面也出现了was,为了避免啰嗦就采取了省略。但是这种省略好像也没多大的必要,and连接两个完整的句子我觉得反而更清晰。

最好有NN指导一下,分词前面的主谓成分何时能省、何时不能省。但是我相信一个原则,只要句子表达意思清晰,不引起歧义,省不省略无关大碍,简而言之就是清晰为首、简洁为次。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-28 17:31:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 rosmarine

以下是引用rosmarine在2006-4-28 17:05:00的发言:
第一道题的D是错误选项,错在although和not proved之间省略了it has not been,也就是省略了主语和谓语,只剩下not proved的分词结构,这就使得that没有所指。that作为同位语从句的引导词必须指向一个主体词,如E里的that指向形式主语it,这样句子就符合语法了。

你的 第一题解答的很清楚。。that  同位语从句无所指。。 我懂了。。

但是 有没有这种可能,即D 选项是 这样 补充 的。---(宾语从句 例如:Tests have proved that the system works)

Although studies did not prove that the consumption of any foods reverse hardening of the arteries, studies indicate that refraining from eating certain foods can

这样 的解释 又怎么说??

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-28 17:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用pengfei1102在2006-4-28 16:36:00的发言:

1还有这道题:


.        Once the economic and social usefulness of the motor car was demonstrated and with its superiority to the horse being proved, much of the early hostility to it in rural regions disappeared.


(A) and with its superiority to the horse being


(B) and its superiority over the horse had been


(C) and its superiority to the horse


(D) its superiority over the horseC


(E) with its superiority to the horse having been



答案C说是 proved 前 省略了 was,  为什么 可以这样省/?



这一题,我在发个新贴, 有准确解释了,我通知你,。谢谢你的 帮助。。非常感谢

9#
发表于 2006-4-28 17:48:00 | 只看该作者
你这么改,语法上没问题,如果没有更好的答案,你这个也能凑合。但是,E肯定比这个好,因为句子并不强调是studies证实“食物能软化血管”、还是experiments证实“食物能软化血管”、还是某些scientists证实“食物能软化血管”,句子旨在说明“食物能软化血管”这一点还没被证实,因此你无须特意用主动语态来指出哪个施动者证实了“食物能软化血管”。用it has not been proved,it指代“食物能软化血管”简洁明了。

还有,做语法题我觉得你不要想得太多,看到答案知道错在哪里就可以了,不要去钻牛角尖。
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-28 18:00:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢  rosmarine 。。 我知道了。 太钻牛角尖了。


呵呵。 祝 rosmarine 好运

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 11:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部