ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 980|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-2002-June-II-04

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-26 02:26:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-2002-June-II-04

Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few diversions to amuse them. THerefore, they likely read much more than we do today.


Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?


A. Many of the books published a century ago were of low literary quality.


B. ON average, people who lived a century ago had considerably less leisure time than we do today.


C. The number of books sold today is larger than it was a century ago.


D. ON the average, books today cost slightly less in relation to other goods than they did a century ago.


E. One of the popular diversions of a century ago was horse racing.


Key is B, the reason is, if people have few diversions to amuse them, and less leisure time, they would not read much more than we do today, it is weakening the argument, but, what about E? If most people did horse racing, they would not have time for book reading, doesn't that weakening the argument too?

沙发
发表于 2005-6-27 19:53:00 | 只看该作者
E is wrong because it does not conpare with today.Maybe today, horse racing is also popular.So, the popularity of horse racing a century ago can not cause the differnce of diversions of amusement
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-28 04:27:00 | 只看该作者
cool explanation, thanks.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 23:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部