ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9968|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og11是不是过去分词短语都不能做状语修饰动词?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-23 16:38:00 | 只看该作者

og11是不是过去分词短语都不能做状语修饰动词?

11. Based on accounts of various ancient writers, scholars have painted a sketchy picture of the activities of an all-female cult that, perhaps as early as the sixth century B.C., worshipped a goddess known in Latin as Bona Dea, "the good goddess."
(A)    Based on accounts of various ancient writers
(B)    Basing it on various ancient writers' accounts
(C)    With accounts of various ancient writers used for a basis
(D)    By the accounts of various ancient writers they used
(E)    Using accounts of various ancient writers
答案E
A中的Based on accounts of various ancient writers不能修饰主句的动词have painted吗?是不是所有的过去分词短语都不能做状语?
沙发
发表于 2003-12-23 17:04:00 | 只看该作者
A选项还原后变成scholars were based on....。这边用被动语态是不合适的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-23 17:11:00 | 只看该作者
我知道og的解释是这样的,但是为什么不能还原成scholars have painted....based on.....?即based on修饰painted?
地板
发表于 2003-12-23 23:58:00 | 只看该作者
UP,请教
5#
发表于 2003-12-24 00:35:00 | 只看该作者
分词结构做状语  
如果没有自己的 独立主语
起主语为主句逻辑主语
.....讨论...
6#
发表于 2003-12-24 02:35:00 | 只看该作者
Agree with Crusader. The only exception I am aware of is "considering" or "regarding" because they are not "v+ing".
7#
发表于 2003-12-24 04:03:00 | 只看该作者
感谢Mindfree大大指点.
(Mindfree大大总能看得那么in-depth,激动ing...)

我来做补充 举几个例子
有些特定动词的动名词,在现代英语已经改变了词性进化为连词和(或者)介词来引导从句.
Considering
Considering the strength of the opposition, we did very well to score two goals.
I think we paid too much for the house, considering that we needed to get the roof repaired.
John did quite well in his exams, considering how little he studied.
Regarding
Regarding your recent inquiry, I have enclosed a copy of our new brochure.
Concerning
The police are anxious for any information concerning the woman's whereabouts.
We have several questions concerning the report.
Granted
Granted, the music is not perfect, (but)the flaws are outweighed by the sheer joy of the piece. (BUT省略Granted做连词 引导从句,BUT不省略Granted做adj)
先就想起这么几个
继续讨论...
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-24 08:54:00 | 只看该作者
ft啊~~~
我都看不懂你们在说什么了,我问的问题好像还没解答呀。
9#
发表于 2003-12-24 10:57:00 | 只看该作者
What you ask is the basic question of SC.
In the real test, you may hurt your score.
I think these people already told you what you need.
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-24 16:40:00 | 只看该作者
特意查了查大学语法,“分词作状语分词在句子中作状语,可以表示时间、条件、原因、结果、让步、伴随等。分词做状语时,它的逻辑主语与句子的主语一致。作状语的分词相当于一个状语从句。”,原来以为的状语就像副词那样修饰谓语呢,这样一说才明白,虽然高手们英语很棒,可是也应该把中文说明白是吧。你这样一说弄得我都不敢问问题了,不过好在我脸皮厚。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-18 02:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部