ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1319|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-TN23-Q2详细解释=外加一个平行的小问题~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-10-17 15:36:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Pasco del Rio, is the city's most popular attraction.
A. Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio
B. Unlike the river in many cities in the United Stated, which is no longer the local point of urban life, in San Antonio the river
C. Today the river in many cities in the United States is no longer the focal point of urban life, unlike San Antonio, where it
D. In few United States cities today, a river is the focal point of urban life, but the river in San Antonio
E.No longer do many cities in United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in San Antonio the river

这道题的答案是E,有一个很好的解释如下:
choice a:
faulty comparison:
'unlike many u.s. cities, ... the river in san antonio...' --> can't compare cities to a river
choice b:
comparison isn't so good:
the second part should start directly with 'the river' (instead of 'in san antonio the river...'), so that the comparison is more clear.
much more importantly, poor use of the relative pronoun 'which':
'...cities in the united states, which is no longer the focal point...'
relative pronouns like which, by default, refer to the noun that's closest to the left, which in this case is the united states. therefore, this relative pronoun is used in a way that's either ambiguous (if you allow it to potentially refer to other nouns) or just plain wrong (if you follow the rule strictly).
choice c:
faulty comparison again
'the river...' is being compared to san antonio.
choice d:
drastic change in meaning
this sentence has completely gotten rid of any reference to the concept of 'no longer'. while all the other sentences say that things have changed, this sentence presents the situation as if it's always been that way.

但是我有一个平行并列的问题:由and but or for nor yet 连词连接的分句不用要求平行并列吗?如E中,难道but in 之前不需要一个并列的结构存在吗?谢谢解答~


收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-10-17 22:22:47 | 只看该作者
ddddddddddd
板凳
发表于 2015-3-21 10:48:30 | 只看该作者
我选的B为什么不对啊。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2015-3-21 18:18:22 | 只看该作者
willingyue 发表于 2015-3-21 10:48
我选的B为什么不对啊。。

comparison isn't so good:
the second part should start directly with 'the river' (instead of 'in san antonio the river...'), so that the comparison is more clear.
much more importantly, poor use of the relative pronoun 'which':
'...cities in the united states, which is no longer the focal point...'
relative pronouns like which, by default, refer to the noun that's closest to the left, which in this case is the united states. therefore, this relative pronoun is used in a way that's either ambiguous (if you allow it to potentially refer to other nouns) or just plain wrong (if you follow the rule strictly).
5#
发表于 2015-3-21 21:21:24 | 只看该作者
D 为什么错, 我还是没明白。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 08:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部