|
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.
(A) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, (B) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi, (C) Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon, (D) Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon, (E) Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi,
答案是C。我的问题是关于A选项的，OG中对A的解释是介词短语in the form of carbon dioxide就近修饰的是fungi，应该修饰carbon，而没有提到其他的。找了很多NN各个版本对A的分析，有个问题没人做出一个明确的解答啊。
这里是拿plants和fungi在acquiring carbon上进行比较，那么这里的than are fungi有没有错啊？
为什么不是than fungi are?这里是主语比较？如果只是than fungi的话会不会产生比较carbon和fungi的歧义？
以下哪些是对的？如果是语法没有错误，逻辑上比较的是什么？（不考虑划线句子后面的部分）
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi are,
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than at acquiring nitrogen
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than at nitrogen
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than acquiring nitrogen
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than nitrogen
求大神解答，好人一生平安
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2014-9-4 09:25:16
收藏
收藏
楼主
