og13SC22,比较，找了很多发现没人给出解释，继续等，求解答

Satanilles

Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

(A) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi,

(B) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,

(C) Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,

(D) Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,

(E) Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi,

答案是C。我的问题是关于A选项的，OG中对A的解释是介词短语in the form of carbon dioxide就近修饰的是fungi，应该修饰carbon，而没有提到其他的。找了很多NN各个版本对A的分析，有个问题没人做出一个明确的解答啊。

这里是拿plants和fungi在acquiring carbon上进行比较，那么这里的than are fungi有没有错啊？
为什么不是than fungi are?这里是主语比较？如果只是than fungi的话会不会产生比较carbon和fungi的歧义？
以下哪些是对的？如果是语法没有错误，逻辑上比较的是什么？（不考虑划线句子后面的部分）
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi are,
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than at acquiring nitrogen
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than at nitrogen
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than acquiring nitrogen
plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than nitrogen

求大神解答，好人一生平安

Satanilles

自己顶，在线等

Satanilles

等，继续等

yx06tu

这题OG的解释很详细，重点在于划线后面的部分，插入语“, in the form of carbon dioxide,”修饰的是“carbon”， and后面“converting ”需要平行。

yx06tu

如果不考虑划线部分，A是对的。

elleven806

Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars. (A) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, (B) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi, (C) Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon, (D) Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon, (E) Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

楼主这道题问得很有意思呀~值得讨论
我个人看法是
A: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi.
  1）首先为什么是are fungi ,不是 fungi are. 应该是后面接了同位语，所以调换了主谓的位置，哪个在前哪个在后语法上应该都可以，但需要配合CONTEXT，就像这道题。
  2）比较A和C 的不同，我觉得加不加are，还有at acquring carbon的位置 会直接影响句意
比如A  : Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi. plants和fungi都有完整的主谓，说明比较的不是PLANTS 和FUNGI，而是比较他们at acquiring carbon的效能，这里应该重点就是比较 他们是不是能acquire carbon(注： 强调的是aquire 的是carbon,不是methane,也不是oxygen.是carbon）
C: plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon.就明显是主语比较，比较对象是 plants  和 fungi。
个人理解，也不晓得讲清楚木有，大家一起来讨论哈~~

Satanilles

yx06tu 发表于 2014-9-4 10:00
如果不考虑划线部分，A是对的。

谢谢！
但是为什么是are fungi啊？这是倒装吗？

Satanilles

elleven806 发表于 2014-9-4 10:08
楼主这道题问得很有意思呀~值得讨论
我个人看法是
A: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon tha ...

太厉害了！A里面那么小的意味都读出来了，好像确实是这样，我开始还觉得A：Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi.比较的还是plants和fungi，这个太细微了！你说的强调的是at acquiring carbon在获得碳素这方面两者进行比较，我觉得很有道理。

那我后面列的那几个句子呢？能不能麻烦你再看看顺便分析一下?

十分感谢！！

Satanilles

有人吗？