The contractor and the engineer agree on the cause of the
bridge failure, but both blame the other.
- both blame the other
- each blames the other
- each blame the other person
- both are blaming the other
- each blames one another
这道题答案是B
但是我之前做过一道prep的题，说the other 不能单独使用，要用 one...the other才行，所以直接把AB排除了选的E
请问NN这里为什么又可以用呢？
PREP的题和解释我贴在下面了～
17. (25335-!-item-!-188;#058&002335)
The success of the program to eradicate smallpox has stimulated experts to pursue what they had
not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as
(A) what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other
(B) what they had not previously considered a possibility--better control, if not eradication, of such
(C) something they had not previously considered possible-better control, if not eradication, of such
(D) something not considered a previous possibility--better control and perhaps eradication, of
(E) the possibility of what they had not previously considered--better control and possibly
eradication of infections like
句子结构：The success… has stimulated experts to pursue…
To pursue something是不定式作补语，后跟定语从句（省略了关系代词that）。
习惯用语-such as，表示举例时用such as，而不是用like。
简洁有效，谓语动词后直接加形容词作补语；如果能用名词替代一个名词性从句，优先选名词（比如
something, probability, likelihood等）。
逻辑表达，原句的插入语不能随意改为句中并列的成分，会使表达意思改变，而且有些动作是不可能
用and连接同时发生的，如本题中的control和eradication。
(A) something代替名词从句，简洁；the other结构不完整，应该是one… the other搭配。
(B) consider a possibility表达方式不及直接跟形容词简洁有效；such like搭配错误，应该是such as。
(C)正确，if not eradication是插入语，such as…举例。
(D) consider应直接跟形容词，a previous possibility表达错误且改变了原意；control and perhaps
eradication不符合逻辑，改变了原句意思；possibility与perhaps语意重复；other用错，没有搭配对象。
(E) the possibility of what用法错误，应该用that；possibility与possibly重复；control and eradication
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-5-14 12:42:09
收藏
收藏
楼主
