ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 11041|回复: 28
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 1-132

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-5 13:55:00 | 只看该作者

prep 1-132

132.
            
(31556-!-item-!-188;#058&004545)

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

(A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

(A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

(B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

(C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

(D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

(E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

看过关于这题得以前一些的帖子,都还没有说出我的心里话,所以再问。首先肯定两件事情:as compared to没有错,我确定;compare to 只能用被动,也很确定。所以B不对

D和E是典型的宾语从句名词化错误,也不选。只在A与C中选。

prep笔记解释的不选A的理由是compared to的比较对象不对象,我同意。A去掉所有的副词,就是...earn an average of pay, compared to a ratio...确实不等。

但问题是,同理类推,C中the ratio不是也不能作为42 times their pay的同位语了吗? 42 times是修饰their pay的,那么a ratio能去解释前面的修饰语吗?

顺面问一下,twice their pay这种结构,twice是什么词性呢?

沙发
发表于 2008-6-6 00:18:00 | 只看该作者

你的问题问得非常好,下面提供我的见解,

问题一:

A有三处错误,

1.an average of 419 times…pay,非常awkward

2.看看比较的对象,CEO earn more pay than workersthan前后明显是payworkers的比较,所以不对应;

3.a ratio of 42 times,这么说很别扭,也是awkward

另外,prep中说compared to a ratio错,我也不认可,前面的比较可以认为是一个ratio,然后一个ratio和后面的ratio对比是可以的;

 

Bon average避免了Aawkward表达;

419 times the pay也避免了比较对象的错误;

a ratio可以作为一个概括性质的名词对前面的内容进行概括;

后面a ratio 42 times比较错误,而且42 times在这里应该补全,我们不清楚什么是42 times或者什么是什么的42 times,还有可能是42in 1980

 

Con average 避免了之前的错误;

419 times the pay避免了比较错误,后面补全是,

...CEO's earn 419 times the pay..as compared to CEO's earn 42 times their pay the ratio...

their指代最后一个复数,即workers,没问题;

the ratio作为一个概括性名词,指代前面的比例关系,没问题;

 

DE,宾从缺that,另外也存在有前面AB有的错误;

 

问题二:

 twice their pay之前没留意过,twice是副词应该没问题,很多时候都这么用,搜了一些倍数表达的资料,看看是不是符合下面第3)个用法;

      1)、倍数+形容词/副词比较级+than
  The girl is ten times cleverer than her brother.
  2)、倍数+as+形容词/副词/(名词)+as
  His apartment is three times as large as that of mine. Americans eat twice as much protein as they actually need every day.
  3)、倍数+名词
  The sun is many times the size of the moon.
  4)、动词+倍数
  The pants have shortened two times since they were bought.
  5)、动词+by+数词/百分比/倍数

希望有所帮助;

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-7 00:31:00 | 只看该作者

问题一:

如此说来,A错除了awkward最明显的原因是动词没有补全导致歧义

问题二:

twice是adv 这个的确没问题,但是成分呢?只能理解为状语修饰动词而不是定语修饰the pay?

地板
发表于 2008-6-7 00:39:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用aprilxlql在2008-6-7 0:31:00的发言:

问题一:

如此说来,A错除了awkward最明显的原因是动词没有补全导致歧义

问题二:

twice是adv 这个的确没问题,但是成分呢?只能理解为状语修饰动词而不是定语修饰the pay?

A,应该不是没有补全,是比较前后概念不对称吧;

twice the pay,我只当习惯用法了,没有深究副词修饰名词到底怎么回事,不好意思;

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-7 10:05:00 | 只看该作者

CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers.

简化句子结构:CEO's earn more pay than blue-collar workers

再看这句话:I eat more apples than you. 和I eat more apples than you eat.

现在是否同意是动词没补全的问题?

6#
发表于 2008-6-7 10:53:00 | 只看该作者

A earn more pay than pay(that)B earn

A earn more pay than B earn

我觉得应该都可以吧;

参考,

 OG10-187

 In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as (Americans) would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.

 OG10-132

 According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about as many as (people) are enrolled in
                
the nation’s four-year colleges and universities.

187题省略了Americans,132题省略了people;

更正一下,此题应该是没补全的问题;

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-7 11:11:00 | 只看该作者

Thank you!

8#
发表于 2008-6-7 11:15:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用aprilxlql在2008-6-7 11:11:00的发言:

Thank you!

共同研究,共同进步,
9#
发表于 2008-6-7 12:43:00 | 只看该作者

我又想了想,其实补不补全目的就在于保证没有歧异;

我在字典里找到,He gets more
            pay
            than most of us.

我就觉得这句话没什么问题;

另外还有一题是,

Prep SC Part2-90. (29271-!-item-!-188;#058&004232)

Diesel engines burn as much as 30 percent less fuel than gasoline engines
                    of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases that have been implicated in global warming.

(A) of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases that have

(B) of comparable size, as well as emit far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases having

(C) of comparable size, and also they emit far fewer carbon dioxide and other gases that have

(D) that have a comparable size, and also they emit far less carbon dioxide gas and other gases that have

(E) that have a comparable size, as well as emitting far fewer carbon dioxide and other gases having

A burn less fuel than B;看来也是可以的;

这两个实际都是犯了吃苹果的错误

所以还是要具体问题具体-看句子意思-分析吧,;

Prep SC Part2-90. (29271-!-item-!-188;#058&004232)

Diesel engines burn as much as 30 percent less fuel than gasoline engines
            of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases that have been implicated in global warming.

(A) of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases that have

(B) of comparable size, as well as emit far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gases having

(C) of comparable size, and also they emit far fewer carbon dioxide and other gases that have

(D) that have a comparable size, and also they emit far less carbon dioxide gas and other gases that have

(E) that have a comparable size, as well as emitting far fewer carbon dioxide and other gases having

A burn less fuel than B;看来也是可以的;

这两个实际都是犯了吃苹果的错误

所以还是要具体问题具体-看句子意思-分析吧,;

10#
发表于 2008-11-1 15:32:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 14:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部