- UID
- 790382
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-8-5
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
21Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
这题我只有一点不明白 就是用in attributing 开头还是用if 开头,别的错误就别再解释了,我纠结在AC选项怎么就主语指代错误了呢,我知道应该是Defense attorneys 发出的这个 attributing 的动作,我把AC简化一下就是 Defense attorneys .......but in attributing .......,the perpetrators,,但是为什么在这个时候in attributing 的主语是the perpetrators而不是 Defense attorneys ,明明是but前后有两个主语,但是为什么解释都说这个动作的主语是the perpetrators。
还有就是BD选项用if ,简化为 Defense attorneys.........but if ........,the perpetrators,这个时候if 引导的是从句么,如果是的话该从句的主语应该和主句主语保持一致,那么谁是他的主句 谁又是他的主句主语,为什么是主句,为什么是主句主语?
求牛牛 超级牛牛 解答
|
|