ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1799|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-5-4-21(CHELSEA更正标题格式)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-9 14:37:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-5-4-21(CHELSEA更正标题格式)

21. Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United States were cut in half, an estimated 5,000 lives might be saved each year.



Thomas: How can that be? That would mean that if people adopt this single change in diet for ten years, the population ten years from now will be greater by 50,000 people than it otherwise would have been.




Which one of the following is a statement that Leona could offer Thomas to clarify her own claim and to address the point he has made?



(A) It is possible for the population to grow by 5,000 people for every year if the base year chosen for purposes of comparison is one with unusually low population growth.



(B) It is accurate to say that 5,000 lives have been saved as long as 5,000 people who would have died in a given year as a result of not changing their diet, did not do so–even if they died for some other reason.



(C) If egg consumption were reduced by more than half, the estimated number of lives saved each year could be even more than 5,000.



(D) The actual rate of population growth depends not only on the birth rate, but also on changes in life expectancy.



(E) For the average consumption of eggs to be cut by half, many individual consumers would have to cut their own consumption by much more than half.


很讽刺,一看到B就排除了。estimated 和accurate一眼就pass 了。看来看去没答案。现在对B也不理解。


沙发
发表于 2004-12-11 02:30:00 | 只看该作者

B ==) in a given year, 5,000 peple can be saved by changing their diet, provided that these people would have died without chaning thier diet. Even if they died for other reasons (say car accident), you still can say that they are saved by chaning their diet.

this is a clarification of Leona's own view. Meanwhile, it points out that Thomas's caculation is "too simple, too naive". that is: some guys would have died of eating too many eggs. You can still say their lives are saved if they eat less eggs and therefore do not die of over-egg-eating. However, they still could die for other reasons. So you cannot simply say, in a term of 10 years, those guys who survive will increase the number of population.

""I hope I've given you a right explanation, hehe""

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-13 11:06:00 | 只看该作者

Get it!Thank you!

地板
发表于 2006-4-9 16:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用chelseayang在2004-12-11 2:30:00的发言:

B ==) in a given year, 5,000 peple can be saved by changing their diet, provided that these people would have died without chaning thier diet. Even if they died for other reasons (say car accident), you still can say that they are saved by chaning their diet.


3Q

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-11 21:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部