- UID
- 751291
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-4-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Independent Writing: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job and work long hoursfor three days in a week than to work shorter hours for five days in a week. Some people claimthat they are more enjoyable to have a job and work short hours for more daysin a week than to work for a long hour for few days in a week, because a fast-pacedplace is undoubtedly damnify people’s physical fitness and daily social life. But in fact, I believe it is an exaggeration tosay a nervous working rhythm will cause damage of people’s health and social life. In the firstplace, the nervous working rhythm can encourage people continually improve the efficiencythemselves. We all have an experience where some important works are coming tomeet the deadline; we will focus more and pay more attention on the task in thatcritical moment. In that moment, doing our utmost to achieve our goal can makeus get into a good habit, thus, accomplish the work efficiently. Moreover, tokeep that efficient state, people should insure their good health. Hence, in myopinion, the things which will definitely damage of worker’s health can only happento those most undisciplined person who are careless about their health. In the secondplace, because of the short concentrated working time, people in this working patternare able to have longer relaxing time rather than the people who choose to workfor five days every week. This part ofspare time can be used effectively. If aperson wants to learn more things out of works, the four days spare time wouldbe very valuable for the working people to arrange by themselves. Likewise, forthe working people who are always complaining about the lacking chance of doingthe social communication, the free time is enable them to do social work. Even ifthe person feel much tired about last three days’ work, travel around the countryseems like a good idea to relax themselves. Furthermore, compressthe working time can indeed develop the ability of working under enormouspressure. There is no denying that training one in such situation will enhance psychologicalquality quickly. As the adage says “Success began awakening, decide the fatementality.” the implication being that good psychological quality is a vitalfactor on the way of success. Based on all thesearguments, even though the model of working long hour for three weeks in a weekcan be a challenge for amount of people, the big blocks of spare time thatfollowed for us to arrange.
Integrated Writing: TPO15 The reading passagerecommended the issue of several methods to stop the spread of cane toads in Australia.And the professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks thatamount of the three of the issue are definitely inadequate for the localenvironment, which contradicts what the reading state. And in the lecture, sheuses three specific points to support her idea. Firstly, even thoughthe reading passage suggest that the simple way of stop the multiplied of thecane toad is to build national fence, the professor argues in the lecture that thisway is unlikely to be effectively. This is because the young toad and the toadeggs are found in the relevant stream, which means the river and stream cancarry the eggs and young toads through the fence. Obviously, the professor’sargument disproves the counterpart in the reading. Moreover, despitethe statement in the reading that the toad can be captured and destroyed by thelarge amount of volunteers, the professor contends that it is sure that thetoad can be caught, however, this method will cause the ecological destroy.Then she supports this point with the fact that the second method mentioned inthe reading passage will also destroys native frogs, and some of the nativespecies have already in dangerous, in other words, some young volunteers cannotdistinguish the native frog and the toad clearly, that will cause theecological damages. Finally, the processerasserts that the third method is a bad idea and whereas the author of thereading claims that the developing virus can control the population of toads. Theprofessor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that usingthis way will also destroy the population in North America, and the whole ecologicalsystem can be suffered. In conclusion, theprofessor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage andconvincingly shows that the central argument in the reading, thus, severalmethod of stopping spread of toad is incorrect. 综合写作的模板用的好像有点长了…………第一次写
|
|