- UID
- 815413
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-10-8
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
======================================================================
观点:虽然将学生成绩和教师的工资挂钩在一定程度上有利于促进教育质量的提升,但是会产生一些意想不到的不利因素,因此不宜施行。 正:将学生成绩和教师的工资挂钩,可以通过经济利益直接刺激教师,有利于调动教师的积极性,促进学生成绩的提升。(为了帮助差学生提高成绩,教师可能会主动加班为学生补课) 反:将学生成绩和教师的工资挂钩,会产生一些不利的结果,其结果反而可能降低教育质量: (1)会造成应试教育流行,导致学生的综合素质降低(例如,产生高分低能儿) (2)会阻碍教学创新(教师将大多数时间和精力花在了提高学生应试能力方面,教学创新自然少了) (3)教师会更关注学生的短期表现 反:因此,不宜全面推行工资和学生成绩挂钩的做法。可以采取其他办法达到这个目的(定期评比优秀教师,并给予奖励)。
In the modern society, more and more parents care about their children's education quality and there is a certain suggestion that we should connect the teachers' salaries with the students' academic performance. While this institution has some advantages to promote students' score, it may bring some obvious negative influence to our education.
Admittedly, making connection between teachers' salaries and students' performance can directly raise the teachers' responsibility. For example, in order to help students who have bad performance in certain discipline and gain a comprehensive improvement of all students, teachers may spend their spare time voluntarily on helping these guys.
However, evaluating the teachers' work according to their students' performance and pay them based on this assertion can obviously bring some disadvantages, which can even decrease the quality of education. Firstly, emphasizing too heavily on the students' academic performance, usually reflected by exam result, can lead to population of exam-oriented education. Regardless the knowledge learning and capability enhancement, exam-oriented only focus on the final score of students, which is useless to actual problem resolving in our lives. For example, under this education guideline, some students with excellent academic performance but low capacity are founded all over the country. They can make little benefit to our development of society but gain high marks in exams which obeys original goal of education. Secondly, establishing solid connection between students' performance and their teachers' salaries can dramatic harm teachers' creative aspiration and capability. Since original work done by teachers is no longer cherished by the evaluation criteria, there is need for them to spend additional time on teaching methodology research, which can absolutely impede the progress of education.
Furthermore, teachers may pay more attention to the students' short-term performance and overlook their long-term training. For example, in order to gain higher mark in the exam, only the relative knowledge and problem resolving skills will be mentioned in their lessons. Even though the student get idealistic result, their eye-sight is not broaden which has no assistance to their later education.
In conclusion, although making connection between teachers' salaries and students' academic performance can directly provoke the teachers' enthusiasm, it may lead to long-term and potential harmfulness to students' learning and problem resolving capacity. So more consideration is needed to make a rational and effective decision. |
|