我覺得在兩個noun都貌似符合meaning的前提下,如果是選cajuns的話,是因為subject優先。 但我困惑的是“the 4,000 acadians”。 (1)在manhattan forum上面看到Ron如下說: [the + numerical expression] indicates that these items/people/whatever are everything that exists. 就是說[the + numerical expression]表示的是expression裏面的noun的所有數量。見下例: e.g. 1 three witnesses to a crime does not imply that there are only three witnesses The three witnesses to a crime implies that those are the only three people who were witnesses. 代入題目就是,全部acadians就是4000個。 (2)另外,在MANHATTAN里看到這樣說的:the personal pronouns it and they/them indicate definiteselection of an entire object or collection.
然後後面的例句是:After walking by the chocolates so many times, Roger finally had to eat THEM. 如果根據MANHATTAN所說它們要知道definite selection of an entire object or collection的話,我覺得their指代the 4000 acadians貌似要比cajuns合理,因為acadians前面有the,並且4000已經是他們全部的數量了。 但是找了很久,都沒有找到support俺這個想法的材料。 希望看到的童鞋能夠share ur ideas!! 很想知道我這個想法有木有問題!! 謝謝!! -- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/25 16:13:03)
原來OG上面有說答案的!汗...
不過OG裏面只是說了“The sentence describes the Cajun language as 17c French”,並沒有解釋原因。
仍然困頓...難道subject優先就一定是cajun嗎? 求nn解答,謝! |